Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical interventional procedures-reducing the radiation risks.

C Cousins1, C Sharp

  • 1Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK. claire.cousins@addenbrookes.nhs.uk

Clinical Radiology
|May 18, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deformation and Collectivity in Doubly Magic ^{208}Pb.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Suspected paraneoplastic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion associated with a gastric adenocarcinoma in a dog.

Australian veterinary journal·2024
Same author

Standards for clinical trials for treating TB.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2023
Same author

Quantifying the Representation of Black Adolescents in Suicide Intervention Research.

Research on child and adolescent psychopathology·2023
Same author

COVID-19 conversations: A qualitative study of majority Hispanic/Latinx youth experiences during early stages of the pandemic.

Child & youth care forum·2021
Same author

Keeping the ICRP recommendations fit for purpose.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same journal

Semiautomated magnetic resonance imaging-based breast density measurement from routine sequences: comparison with mammography.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Where can we improve? An evaluation of discrepancies between radiology resident and consultant reports for noncontrast head computed tomography (NCHCT) scans in the emergency department at a tertiary care centre.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy: neuroradiology considerations and challenges.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Weight-based contrast media volume reduction in lower limb computed tomography angiography: a prospective feasibility study.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of flat panel computed tomography for acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same journal

Nuclear medicine techniques in gynaecological malignancy: a review of best practice.

Clinical radiology·2026
See all related articles

Minimizing radiation risks during fluoroscopically guided interventions is crucial. Enhanced training and adherence to safety protocols are essential for protecting patients and healthcare professionals from radiation exposure.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiation Safety
  • Interventional Procedures

Background:

  • Percutaneous interventional procedures utilizing fluoroscopy have surged over the past 40 years.
  • These procedures can expose patients and staff to significant radiation doses, risking immediate and delayed effects.
  • Inadequate training in radiation safety and radiobiology is common among non-radiologist clinicians.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the increasing reliance on fluoroscopically guided interventions.
  • To emphasize the associated risks of radiation exposure to patients and staff.
  • To advocate for improved radiation safety training and practices in interventional procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of radiation risks and potential adverse effects.
  • Discussion of regulatory and clinical governance requirements for radiation protection.

    • Main Results:

    • High radiation doses are a significant concern in many interventional procedures.
    • Existing training in radiation safety is often insufficient for non-radiologist interventionists.
    • Effective radiation protection requires a multi-faceted approach including equipment, quality assurance, and operational techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimizing patient and staff safety necessitates a rigorous approach to radiation protection.
    • Comprehensive training in radiation safety, dose measurement, and reduction techniques is vital for interventionists.
    • Clinical governance mandates informed consent, patient counseling, and follow-up regarding radiation exposure.