Related Experiment Videos
Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load
Jean-Claude Croizet1, Gérard Després, Marie-Eve Gauzins
1Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France. croizet@srvpsy.univ-bpclermont.fr
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 25, 2004
Summary
Stereotype threat can lower intellectual performance. When a cognitive test was framed as measuring ability, stereotyped groups scored lower, but this gap vanished when the test
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Stereotype threat research shows situational context impacts intellectual performance.
- Social groups' cognitive abilities are sensitive to testing environments.
- Previous studies highlight the influence of perceived group reputation on test outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how stereotype threat affects cognitive ability scores.
- To examine the role of situational context in performance disparities.
- To determine if perceived intellectual inferiority triggers measurable mental workload.
Main Methods:
- An adaptation of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test was used.
- Participants were divided into groups based on stereotype threat manipulation.
- Heart rate variability indices were employed to assess mental workload.
Main Results:
- Individuals facing stereotype threat scored significantly lower on cognitive tests.
- The performance gap disappeared when the test was not framed as an ability measure.
- Increased mental load, indicated by heart rate variability, correlated with lower scores under threat.
Conclusions:
- Situational burdens, not inherent ability differences, can explain group disparities in test scores.
- Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by inducing disruptive mental load.
- Cognitive testing environments must account for stereotype threat to accurately assess ability.