Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequence learning and sequential effects.

E Soetens1, A Melis, W Notebaert

  • 1Cognitive and Physiological Psychology, University of Brussels (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. esoetens@vub.ac.be

Psychological Research
|May 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Honoring Hartmut Karl Lichtenthaler, innovative pioneer of photosynthesis, on his 90<sup>th</sup> birthday.

Photosynthetica·2025
Same author

openBF: an open-source finite volume 1D blood flow solver.

Physiological measurement·2024
Same author

The subjective evaluation of task switch cues is related to voluntary task switching.

Cognition·2022
Same author

Caregivers in home palliative care: gender, psychological aspects, and patient's functional status as main predictors for their quality of life.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2019
Same author

Learning to be in control involves response-specific mechanisms.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

Improved biomechanical metrics of cerebral vasospasm identified via sensitivity analysis of a 1D cerebral circulation model.

Journal of biomechanics·2019
Same journal

Musical training increases anticipatory responding and predictive control in sequence learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

Emotion-specific modality effects in auditory and visual perception of emotion.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The effect of retrieval practice on incidental memory is modulated by emotional valence: evidence of ERPs.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The length of a piece of string: Where the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts.

Psychological research·2026
Same journal

The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.

Psychological research·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that sequence learning in reaction time tasks shares mechanisms with automatic facilitation, particularly at short response-to-stimulus intervals (RSI). The learning process is consistent whether stimuli are presented in predictable or random sequences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Serial reaction time (RT) tasks assess cognitive processes by measuring response times to sequences of stimuli.
  • Sequential effects in RT tasks demonstrate how prior stimuli influence current responses.
  • Sequence learning involves acquiring knowledge about stimulus transitions, impacting performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between sequence learning and sequential effects in serial RT tasks.
  • To explore the role of response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) length and sequence complexity.
  • To determine if sequence learning and automatic facilitation share underlying mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulating response-to-stimulus interval (RSI) length and sequence complexity in a probabilistic serial RT task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessing sequence learning by comparing performance on practiced versus unpracticed sequences in a random block.
  • Analyzing sequential effects as the influence of preceding stimuli on current RT.

    • Main Results:

    • A clear parallel was observed between sequence learning and changes in sequential effects under short RSI conditions.
    • This parallel suggests a common mechanism underlies sequence learning and automatic facilitation at short RSIs.
    • Changes in sequential effects during learning mirrored those seen with practice in random serial RT tasks.

    Conclusions:

    • Sequence learning and automatic facilitation likely share a common neural or cognitive mechanism.
    • The learning process in sequence learning tasks is fundamentally the same as in standard random RT tasks.
    • Understanding these mechanisms provides insights into implicit learning and cognitive control.