Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interim restorations.

David G Gratton1, Steven A Aquilino

  • 1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1001, USA. david-gratton@uiowa.edu

Dental Clinics of North America
|June 3, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of morphological integration in the dental arches of individuals with malocclusion.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2016
Same author

In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2016
Same author

Impact of Digital Tooth Preparation Evaluation Technology on Preclinical Dental Students' Technical and Self-Evaluation Skills.

Journal of dental education·2016
Same author

Effect of Computer-Assisted Learning on Students' Dental Anatomy Waxing Performance.

Journal of dental education·2015
Same author

Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2014
Same author

Dental anatomy grading: comparison between conventional visual and a novel digital assessment technique.

Journal of dental education·2014
Same journal

Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma: A Dental Perspective.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Expanding Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial Trauma Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revision Surgery for Occlusal Correction in Facial Trauma.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Mandibular Condylar Fractures and Occlusal Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Occlusion Management in Facial Trauma: A Literature Review.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dental Implants in Rehabilitation of Patients with Facial Trauma: a Review of Most Current Practices.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Choosing the right interim restoration material is key in prosthodontics. Bis-acryl is best for single units, while poly(methylmethacrylate) suits complex, long-term cases, but technique matters most.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials Engineering

Background:

  • Interim restorations are crucial in fixed prosthodontic treatment, serving biological and biomechanical functions.
  • They play a vital diagnostic role, acting as a functional and esthetic try-in and guiding the design of the final prosthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare material selection criteria for interim restorations.
  • To provide guidance on choosing appropriate materials based on clinical application and properties.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of dental materials used for interim restorations.
  • Analysis of physical properties, handling characteristics, patient acceptance, and cost-effectiveness.
  • Comparison of bis-acryl and poly(methylmethacrylate) materials for different clinical scenarios.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No single material perfectly meets all requirements for interim restorations.
  • Bis-acryl materials are generally suitable for single-unit restorations.
  • Poly(methylmethacrylate) materials are ideal for multi-unit, complex, and long-term interim fixed prostheses.

Conclusions:

  • Material selection for interim restorations requires careful consideration of clinical needs and material properties.
  • Fabrication technique significantly impacts the success of interim restorations, often more than the material choice itself.