Related Experiment Videos
Variability in respiratory protection and the assigned protection factor
1Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. mnicas@uclink4.berkeley.edu
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
|June 19, 2004
Summary
Workplace protection factor (WPF) variability in respirators is analyzed using a random effects model. A new method for assigned protection factors (APF) accounts for within- and between-wearer variability, recommending a reduction for half-mask respirators.
Area of Science:
- Occupational health and safety
- Industrial hygiene
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Workplace protection factor (WPF) variability is crucial for respirator effectiveness.
- Existing analyses often assume lognormal distributions but don't separate within- and between-wearer variability.
- Accurate assessment of respirator performance requires accounting for individual wearer differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an analytical framework for respirator WPF data using a normal random effects model.
- To propose a method for establishing an assigned protection factor (APF) that incorporates variance components.
- To re-evaluate the APF for half-mask respirators based on empirical data.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of log-transformed and logit-transformed penetration (P) values from seven studies of half-mask and two studies of powered air-purifying respirators.
- Application of maximum likelihood estimation to a normal random effects model.
- Development of an APF method ensuring <5% of WPFs are below APF for individuals and populations.
Main Results:
- The within-wearer variance component generally dominated the between-wearer component.
- APF calculations using log-transformed and logit-transformed P values showed good agreement.
- For half-mask respirators, estimated APFs ranged from 1.4 to 250, with most studies yielding an APF ≤ 5.3.
Conclusions:
- The proposed random effects model effectively partitions WPF variability.
- The new APF method provides a statistically sound approach to respirator selection.
- A reduction of the assigned protection factor for half-mask respirators from 10 to 5 is recommended.