Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Establishing the most appropriate databases for addressing source level propositions.

C Champod1, I W Evett, G Jackson

  • 1Institut de Police Scientifique et de Criminologie, Bâtiment de chimie, CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny, Switzerland.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|July 24, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine learning algorithms in forensic science: A response to Morrison et al. (2022).

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives within the American criminal justice system.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2022
Same author

Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap.

Forensic science international. Synergy·2021
Same author

A method for measuring the quality of friction skin impression evidence: Method development and validation.

Forensic science international·2021
Same author

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2017
Same author

Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report.

Forensic science international·2017
Same journal

When termites mimic disease: Vertebral osteolysis and indoor scene alteration in the French West Indies.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Forensic soil comparison for traffic accidents caused by soil clods on roadway.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Chemical profiling of counterfeit perfumes: insights within a forensic intelligence approach.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

The forensic limits of hair drug testing: a critical assessment of drug intake and hair concentration relationships.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Carrying the aftermath: forensic trauma as a predictable occupational injury in a lifecycle systems framework.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Footprint analysis in a subadult Slovak population (aged 10-18 years) for stature estimation: a preliminary study.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
See all related articles

This study provides guidelines for selecting appropriate databases to support forensic interpretation. It details a Case Assessment and Interpretation (CAI) model, crucial for assigning probability values in forensic science.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Probability Theory
  • Evidence Interpretation

Background:

  • The Case Assessment and Interpretation (CAI) project has been developed over several years within the Forensic Science Service (FSS).
  • The CAI model's principles, refined through casework, offer a balanced, robust, and logical framework for evidence interpretation.
  • A frequent challenge in forensic interpretation is identifying the most suitable database for assigning probability values to evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present guidelines for selecting appropriate databases in forensic interpretation.
  • To illustrate the application of these guidelines using various case examples.
  • To enhance the robustness and logical consistency of forensic probability assignments.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a set of guidelines presented as flowcharts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application and exploration of these guidelines within a diverse range of forensic case examples.
  • Review of principles underpinning the Case Assessment and Interpretation (CAI) model.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured approach to database selection for forensic probability assessment has been developed.
    • Flowchart-based guidelines are provided to assist practitioners in this selection process.
    • The practical utility of the guidelines is demonstrated through detailed case examples.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed guidelines offer a systematic method for choosing appropriate databases in forensic casework.
    • Implementing these guidelines can improve the consistency and validity of probability assignments in forensic interpretation.
    • The CAI model's principles are foundational to achieving a balanced and logical approach to forensic evidence evaluation.