Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bias reduction in phase refinement by modified interference functions: introducing the gamma correction.

J P Abrahams1

  • 1MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, England. jpa@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk

Acta Crystallographica. Section D, Biological Crystallography
|July 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

TRPXv2.0: superfast, parallel compression of diffraction patterns and images, with native Python and HDF5 support.

Ultramicroscopy·2025
Same author

DiffraGAN: a conditional generative adversarial network for phasing single molecule diffraction data to atomic resolution.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2024
Same author

Ab initio structure determination of nanocrystals of organic pharmaceutical compounds by electron diffraction at room temperature using a Timepix quantum area direct electron detector. Corrigendum.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2018
Same author

Protein structure determination by electron diffraction using a single three-dimensional nanocrystal.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2017
Same author

Ab initio structure determination of nanocrystals of organic pharmaceutical compounds by electron diffraction at room temperature using a Timepix quantum area direct electron detector.

Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances·2016
Same author

Lattice filter for processing image data of three-dimensional protein nanocrystals.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2016
Same journal

Structural insights into the synthesis of FMN in prokaryotic organisms.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Native sulfur/chlorine SAD phasing for serial femtosecond crystallography.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Serial crystallographic analysis of protein isomorphous replacement data from a mixture of native and derivative microcrystals.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

The first crystal structure of the peptidase domain of the U32 peptidase family.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Atomic resolution crystal structure of Sapp2p, a secreted aspartic protease from Candida parapsilosis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
Same journal

Structural characterization of a mitochondrial 3-ketoacyl-CoA (T1)-like thiolase from Mycobacterium smegmatis.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2015
See all related articles

Refinement bias in electron-density maps, caused by model constraints, can be corrected. This bias correction, termed gamma, enhances phase-refinement techniques by improving model accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Crystallography
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Electron-density maps in crystallography are interpreted using models refined against structure factors.
  • Chemical, physical, and symmetry constraints are applied during refinement, but can introduce model or refinement bias.
  • This bias results from an artificially high correlation between the model and experimental structure factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the nature and elimination of model or refinement bias in constrained crystallographic models.
  • To quantify the bias component and its relationship to structure factor relationships.
  • To demonstrate how bias correction can enhance phase-refinement techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the relationships between structure factors imposed by crystallographic constraints.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantification of the bias component (gamma) within constrained models.
  • Application of the gamma correction to phase-refinement techniques, including solvent flattening.

    • Main Results:

    • The magnitude of the bias component (gamma) was found to be equal to the origin vector of the interference function G.
    • Eliminating this bias component enhances the effectiveness of phase-refinement methods.
    • The gamma correction was shown to induce solvent flipping, analogous to results from solvent flattening.

    Conclusions:

    • Model or refinement bias is an inherent artifact of constrained crystallographic refinement.
    • Quantifying and correcting for this bias (gamma correction) improves model accuracy and phase-refinement power.
    • The gamma correction offers a generalizable approach for bias mitigation in various constrained refinement scenarios.