Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Compensator thickness verification using an a-Si EPID.

Geetha V Menon1, Ron S Sloboda

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada.

Medical Physics
|September 21, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: "Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model-based dose calculations" https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16721.

Medical physics·2024
Same author

Prostate size, source configuration, and dosimetry dynamics of stranded <sup>125</sup>I seed implants.

Brachytherapy·2024
Same author

Generation and comparison of 3D dosimetric reference datasets for COMS eye plaque brachytherapy using model-based dose calculations.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

AAPM WGDCAB Report 372: A joint AAPM, ESTRO, ABG, and ABS report on commissioning of model-based dose calculation algorithms in brachytherapy.

Medical physics·2023
Same author

Delivered dose changes in COMS plaque-based ocular brachytherapy arising from vitrectomy with silicone oil replacement.

Brachytherapy·2019
Same author

Robotic-Assisted Needle Steering Around Anatomical Obstacles Using Notched Steerable Needles.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2018
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

This study demonstrates how amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPIDs) can accurately measure compensator thickness for radiation therapy. The method estimates thickness to within 0.5 mm for steel shot compensators up to 4 cm.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Physics
  • Imaging Technology

Background:

  • Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are crucial for therapy verification and dose measurements in clinical settings.
  • Amorphous silicon (a-Si) EPIDs offer advanced capabilities for quality assurance in radiation oncology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the use of an a-Si EPID for verifying the accuracy of radiation therapy compensator fabrication and mounting.
  • To develop and validate a method for estimating compensator thickness using EPID measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Compensator thickness was determined by analyzing the primary transmission component, calculated by subtracting a modeled scatter component from EPID measurements.
  • The method involved calibrating EPID pixel values to energy fluence, determining scatter factors, measuring the attenuation coefficient of steel shot, and employing an analytical scatter model.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Thickness distributions were measured for various compensator types, including flat, test, and clinical designs.

    • Main Results:

    • A linear calibration curve was established for open fields, with a small quadratic component for attenuated beams.
    • EPID scatter factors showed a slight dependence on compensator thickness and field size.
    • The analytical model predicted compensator scatter to be less than 4% at a standard imaging distance.
    • Thickness measurement uncertainty was estimated at approximately 0.5 mm for steel shot compensators under 4 cm thickness.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed method provides a viable approach for verifying compensator fabrication and mounting accuracy using a-Si EPIDs.
    • Despite manufacturing uncertainties, the EPID-based method offers precise thickness estimations crucial for radiation therapy quality assurance.