Children in medical research: balancing protection and access--has the pendulum swung too far?

Lainie Friedman Ross1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA. lross@uchicago.edu

Insights

Research policies for children shifted from protection to access between 1966 and 2003. This evolution requires careful monitoring to ensure child subject protections are not compromised by increased research access.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Pediatric Research Policy

Background:

  • Henry Beecher's 1966 publication highlighted unethical research, including studies involving child subjects.
  • Ethical debates in the 1970s and 1980s led to initial U.S. policies for human subject protection, with specific safeguards (Subpart D) for vulnerable children.

Observation:

  • A policy shift occurred in the 1990s, moving from child protection to ensuring broader access to research participation.
  • New policies from NIH, FDA, and Congress reflected this change in focus.

Findings:

  • The study analyzes the new policies, their underlying motivations, and their effects on pediatric research.
  • The shift aimed to increase access for children in clinical research.

Implications:

  • Increased access to research for children must be balanced with maintaining robust protections.
  • Continued vigilance is necessary to prevent the erosion of safeguards for child research participants under Subpart D.

Related Concept Videos

CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...