Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disrupting feedback processing interferes with rule-based but not information-integration category learning.

W Todd Maddox1, F Gregory Ashby, A David Ing

  • 1University of Texas, Department of Psychology, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. maddox@psy.utexas.edu

Memory & Cognition
|October 14, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sense of agency and decision making.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Sense of agency and addiction.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Is there a criterion in criterial learning? Insights from studying feedback delays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Context modulates brain state dynamics and behavioral responses during narrative comprehension.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Context modulates brain state dynamics and behavioral responses during narrative comprehension.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Beyond Increasing Sample Sizes: Optimizing Effect Sizes in Neuroimaging Research on Individual Differences.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Memory scanning tasks disrupt rule-based category learning but not information-integration learning. This suggests distinct cognitive systems for different types of category learning, challenging single-system theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Category learning involves acquiring knowledge about object categories.
  • Two prominent models of category learning are rule-based and information-integration systems.
  • Cognitive load, such as memory scanning, may differentially affect these systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of a memory scanning task on rule-based and information-integration category learning.
  • To determine if cognitive load differentially affects distinct category learning systems.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed rule-based and information-integration category learning tasks.
  • A memory scanning task was introduced either immediately after categorization (short feedback-processing time) or after a delay (long feedback-processing time).

Related Experiment Videos

  • A control group performed the tasks without the memory scanning component.

    • Main Results:

    • Rule-based category learning was significantly impaired under the short feedback-processing time condition compared to the long feedback-processing time and control conditions.
    • Information-integration category learning performance remained consistent across all conditions.
    • Fewer participants learned the rule-based task in the short feedback-processing time condition, and they required more trials to reach criterion.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings support a multiple-systems approach to category learning, indicating separate mechanisms for rule-based and information-integration learning.
    • The results challenge single-system theories of category learning by demonstrating differential effects of cognitive load.
    • Memory scanning specifically interferes with rule-based learning, suggesting its reliance on more demanding cognitive resources.