Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
The use of think-aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below-average readers
1Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487-0242, USA.
Abstract:
In this study, we examined whether think-aloud procedures would uncover differences in the kinds of inferences generated by average and below-average readers. Participants were 40 third-grade children who were divided into groups of average and below-average readers. All participants completed measures of nonverbal IQ, reading, language, and working memory, and a story comprehension task that consisted of two conditions: listen through and think aloud. The major findings in this study were that (a) average readers generated significantly more explanatory inferences than below-average readers, and (b) comprehension performance as measured by story recall was significantly better for both groups in the think-aloud condition than in the listen-through condition. The discussion addresses the implications of these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Inductive Reasoning
Critical Thinking I
Critical Thinking II
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Language and Cognition
Critical Thinking
Colleges and universities are...

