Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The difference between generating counter examples and using them during reasoning.

Niki Verschueren1, Walter Schaeken, Wim De Neys

  • 1K.U. Leuven Leuven Belgium. Niki.Verschueren@psy.kuleuven.ac.be

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|October 30, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can we train better medical intuition? Exploring the potential of debiasing interventions.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2026
Same author

When Do Generics Feel Justifiable? A Registered Report Bridging Key Theories.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same author

Using large language models to estimate belief strength in reasoning.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Intuitive insight: Fast associative processes drive sound creative thinking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Humans and LLMs rate deliberation as superior to intuition on complex reasoning tasks.

Communications psychology·2025
Same author

Moses illusions, fast and slow.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Understanding causal conditional inferences requires long-term knowledge. A counter example generation task effectively predicts reasoning outcomes, even when participants use varied semantic information processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Causal conditional inferences are crucial for human reasoning.
  • Understanding the role of long-term knowledge in these inferences is an ongoing research area.
  • Counter-examples are often used to test and understand reasoning processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the types of long-term knowledge utilized in solving causal conditional inferences.
  • To compare counter-examples retrieved during reasoning tasks versus generation tasks.
  • To determine the predictive validity of the counter-example generation task for reasoning outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of two taxonomies to categorize counter-examples.
  • Utilizing a counter-example generation task to probe knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing results from the generation task with a reasoning task.
  • Analyzing the proportion of inferences accepted and counter-examples used.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant differences were observed in counter-example types between reasoning and generation tasks.
    • Some participants did not use semantic information as contrasting evidence during reasoning.
    • The generation task successfully predicted the proportion of accepted inferences.
    • The generation task also predicted the number of counter-examples employed during reasoning.

    Conclusions:

    • The counter-example generation task is a valid method for predicting causal conditional inference outcomes.
    • While reasoning processes vary, the generation task captures key aspects of inference acceptance and counter-example usage.
    • Long-term knowledge plays a significant role, and its utilization can be effectively probed through generation tasks.