Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory.

S M Daselaar1, S E Prince, R Cabeza

  • 1Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, Box 90999, LSRC Building, Room B243N, NC 27708, USA. daselaar@duke.edu

Neuroimage
|November 6, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of time-restricted eating and resistance training on skeletal muscle tissue quantity, quality and function in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity: A study protocol.

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD·2025
Same author

Linking the Rapid Cascade of Visuo-Attentional Processes to Successful Memory Encoding.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2020
Same author

Older adults benefit from more widespread brain network integration during working memory.

NeuroImage·2020
Same author

Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during working memory in younger and older adults: A randomized within-subject comparison.

PloS one·2019
Same author

Complementary topology of maintenance and manipulation brain networks in working memory.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Characterization of Surgical Procedures in the Spanish Mohs Surgery Registry (REGESMOHS) for 2013-2015.

Actas dermo-sifiliograficas·2017
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Deactivations during memory encoding, not just activations, are crucial for learning. This study reveals that reduced brain activity for remembered items (deactivations for R-items) signifies efficient resource allocation, aiding successful memory formation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Event-related fMRI studies often link greater activity for remembered items (Dm effect) to successful encoding.
  • Reverse DM effects (revDMs) have been interpreted as detrimental processes, but may reflect deactivations for remembered items (dRs) or activations for forgotten items (aFs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between activations for forgotten items (aFs) and deactivations for remembered items (dRs) within reverse DM effects (revDMs).
  • To investigate whether revDMs reflect detrimental or beneficial encoding processes using a fixation baseline paradigm.

Main Methods:

  • Participants underwent fMRI scanning while encoding semantic or perceptual associations.
  • Memory was assessed using associative recognition tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A fixation baseline allowed distinguishing between aF and dR effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Deactivation for remembered items (dR effects) were observed in prefrontal, temporoparietal, and posterior midline regions for both semantic and perceptual encoding.
    • These dR effects suggest beneficial processes, like efficient neurocognitive resource reallocation.
    • Activation for forgotten items (aF effects) were found in regions like the insula, consistent with detrimental processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Reverse DM effects can reflect beneficial encoding processes, specifically deactivations for subsequently remembered items.
    • Activation decreases, not just increases, are critical for successful learning and memory formation.
    • The findings challenge previous interpretations of revDMs as solely detrimental, highlighting the importance of resource reallocation in memory encoding.