Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Identifying hypertension-related comorbidities from administrative data: what's the optimal approach?
Ann M Borzecki1, Ashley T Wong, Elaine C Hickey
1Department of Health Services, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass, USA. amb@bu.edu
Insights
Identifying patients with hypertension requires careful data analysis. A strategy using two diagnoses over two years from Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases best identifies these outpatients.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Clinical Data Management
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Accurate identification of patients with hypertension is crucial for effective management.
- Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases offer a large source of patient data.
- Optimizing case-finding strategies within these databases is essential for research and clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the most effective strategy for identifying outpatients with hypertension-related diagnoses using VA administrative data.
- To compare the accuracy of administrative data algorithms against a gold standard derived from chart reviews.
Main Methods:
- A review of 1176 outpatient charts from 10 VA sites in 1999 was conducted.
- Eleven diagnoses relevant to hypertension management were used as the gold standard.
- Agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for various administrative data algorithms.
Main Results:
- Using one administrative diagnosis in 1999, agreement ranged from 0.85 to 0.98, with high kappas.
- Sensitivity varied widely (38% to 97%), while specificity exceeded 91% for most diagnoses.
- Requiring two years of data and two diagnoses improved overall performance with minimal sensitivity loss.
Conclusions:
- Agreement between VA administrative data and patient charts for hypertension-related diagnoses is good.
- Administrative data accurately identify patients without a diagnosis but vary in identifying all patients with one.
- The optimal strategy for case-finding involves using two diagnoses within a two-year period from VA administrative databases.
Abstract:
The objective was to determine the best strategy for identifying outpatients with hypertension-related diagnoses using Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative databases. We reviewed 1176 outpatient charts from 10 VA sites in 1999, taking the presence of 11 diagnoses relevant to hypertension management as the "gold standard" for identifying the comorbidity. We calculated agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for the chart versus several administrative data-based algorithms. Using 1999 data and requiring 1 administrative diagnosis, observed agreement ranged from 0.98 (atrial fibrillation) to 0.85 (hyperlipidemia), and kappas were generally high. Sensitivity varied from 38% (tobacco use) to 97% (diabetes); specificity exceeded 91% for 10 of 11 diagnoses. Requiring 2 years of data and 2 diagnoses improved most measures, with minimal sensitivity decrease. Agreement between the database and charts was good. Administrative data varied in its ability to identify all patients with a given diagnosis but identified accurately those without. The best strategy for case-finding required 2 diagnoses in a 2-year period.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension I: Introduction
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...