Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants
Judith Caple1, Debra Armentrout, Valerie Huseby
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 3.218, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. judith.caple@uth.tmc.edu
Insights
Advancing infant feedings at 30 mL/kg per day, compared to 20 mL/kg, led to faster achievement of full feedings and quicker birth weight regain in premature infants. This feeding advancement strategy was safe and reduced the need for intravenous fluids.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Clinical Trial Research
Background:
- Premature infants often require careful nutritional management.
- Optimizing feeding advancement is crucial for infant growth and development.
- Current feeding protocols vary, necessitating research into optimal advancement rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of advancing feedings at 30 mL/kg/day versus 20 mL/kg/day in premature infants.
- To assess the impact of feeding advancement rates on time to full feedings, weight regain, and intravenous fluid duration.
- To evaluate the incidence of feeding complications, including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), in both groups.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, controlled trial involving 155 infants (1000-2000g birth weight, gestational age ≤35 weeks).
- Infants were assigned to either a 30 mL/kg/day or 20 mL/kg/day feeding advancement protocol.
- Outcomes included time to full feedings, weight regain, intravenous fluid duration, and NEC incidence.
Main Results:
- Infants in the 30 mL/kg/day group reached full feedings faster (median 7 vs 10 days).
- Faster birth weight regain (median 11 vs 13 days) and fewer days of intravenous fluids (median 6 vs 8 days) were observed in the intervention group.
- Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) incidence was low and similar between groups (3.2% overall).
Conclusions:
- Advancing feedings at 30 mL/kg/day is a safe and effective strategy for premature infants.
- This higher advancement rate accelerates achievement of full feedings and improves weight gain.
- The findings support optimizing feeding protocols to reduce hospital resource utilization.
Objectives:
To determine whether infants who are fed initially and advanced at 30 mL/kg per day (intervention) take fewer days to get to full feedings than those who are fed initially and advanced at 20 mL/kg per day (control), without increasing their incidence of feeding complications and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We also examined whether these infants regain birth weight earlier, have fewer days of intravenous fluids, and a have shorter hospital stay.
Methods:
A randomized, controlled, single-center trial was conducted in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a community-based county hospital in Houston, Texas. Infants between 1000 and 2000 g at birth, gestational age < or =35 weeks, and weight appropriate for gestational age were allocated randomly to feedings of expressed human milk or Enfamil formula starting and advanced at either 30 mL/kg per day or 20 mL/kg per day. Infants remained in the study until discharge or development of stage > or =IIA NEC.
Results:
A total of 155 infants were enrolled: 72 infants in the intervention group and 83 in the control group. Infants in the intervention group achieved full-volume feedings sooner (7 vs 10 days, median), regained birth weight faster (11 vs 13 days, median), and had fewer days of intravenous fluids (6 vs 8 days, median). Three infants in the intervention group and 2 control infants developed NEC for an overall incidence of 3.2% (relative risk: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.30-10.06).
Conclusion:
Among infants between 1000 and 2000 g at birth, starting and advancing feedings at 30 mL/kg per day seems to be a safe practice and results in fewer days to reach full-volume feedings than using 20 mL/kg per day. This intervention also leads to faster weight gain and fewer days of intravenous fluids.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...

