Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stem cell technologies: regulation, patents and problems.

Shih-Ning Then1

  • 1Court of Appeal, Queensland. snthen@iinet.net.au

Journal of Law and Medicine
|December 4, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Establishing standards for controlled donation after circulatory determination of death in adults: the Bucharest international European Society for Organ Transplantation consensus.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2026
Same author

Ante-mortem interventions for deceased donation: legal barriers and uncertainty in Australia's decision-making frameworks.

The Medical journal of Australia·2025
Same author

The Problem With 'Gillick'.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
Same author

Parental strategies that support adults with intellectual disabilities to explore decision preferences, constraints and consequences.

Journal of intellectual & developmental disability·2025
Same author

Determining the state of guidance on pediatric biobanking for researchers, HRECS, and families: Regulatory mapping of international guidance.

European journal of pediatrics·2024
Same author

Supporting the Involvement of Adults with Cognitive Disabilities in Research: The Need for Reform.

Journal of law and medicine·2024
Same journal

Physician-assisted Suicide in Albania: Is It Constitutionally Protected?

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Interprofessional Learning with Law and Medicine: "In Reality, No Profession Is an Island".

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Nursing Management of Intoxicated Persons under Involuntary Legislation in Emergency Departments in Metropolitan Queensland, Australia; A Focused Ethnography Study.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Calling for Standardised Surrogacy Birth Care Policies: A Brief Report.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Lack of Informed Financial Consent by Health Professionals: Uncertainty & Secrecy.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Detangling AI Transparency in the Medical Regulation Space.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
See all related articles

Governments worldwide grapple with regulating human embryonic stem cell research and its patentability. Divergent legal and policy approaches create global challenges for scientific advancement and therapeutic development.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Ethics
  • Stem Cell Biology
  • Intellectual Property Law

Background:

  • Human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research holds significant therapeutic promise.
  • Polarized public opinion and ethical considerations complicate regulatory frameworks.
  • Existing regulations vary significantly across different governmental jurisdictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare regulatory and patentability approaches to hESC research in Australia, the UK, and the US.
  • To analyze the impact of divergent national policies on global hESC research and innovation.
  • To identify concerns arising from the lack of a universal regulatory and patenting strategy.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative legal and policy analysis of Australian, UK, and US governmental approaches.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionHuman Cloning Prohibition Act (1997 bill)Human Fertilisation and Embryology AuthorityLegal ApproachNational Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)Patent and Trademark Office

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of legislation, policy documents, and patent office decisions related to hESC research.
  • Discussion of the implications of these approaches on scientific progress and patent law.

    • Main Results:

    • Australia, UK, and US have implemented distinct legislative and policy measures to control hESC research.
    • Patentability of hESC technologies differs across the three jurisdictions, with varied patent office policies.
    • Discrepancies in regulation and patent law create global inconsistencies.

    Conclusions:

    • Divergent national strategies for regulating hESC research and patenting stem cell technologies pose challenges.
    • The lack of a universal approach impacts the progression of hESC research and the development of potential therapies.
    • Addressing these inconsistencies is crucial for fostering international collaboration and advancing the field.