Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frames of reference in mobile augmented reality displays.

Weimin Mou1, Frank Biocca2, Charles B Owen3

  • 1Institute of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|December 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Declining age-adjusted mortality but persistent inequalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States, 1999-2024: a CDC WONDER analysis contextualized by GBD 2023.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Real-time patient-specific microwave ablation zone prediction via a unified bioheat solver and MRI-informed perturbation learning.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same author

Bioenergetic failure in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: from glucotoxicity to multidimensional metabolic imbalance.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

DNA Nanotechnology-Enabled Precise Regulation of Nanozymes and Their Applications.

Research (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Application of AIIR algorithm for quality improvement and noise reduction in pediatric abdominal contrast-enhanced CT.

Frontiers in radiology·2026
Same author

Activation of peripheral muscarinic receptors rescues depressive-like behaviors via gut-brain-axis, involving parasympathetic excitation.

Acta pharmacologica Sinica·2026
Same journal

Configurational antecedents of employee green behavior: A mixed methods study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

The effects of counterfactual thinking on unilateral forgiveness: Can victims do it on their own?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Gray swan neglect: Do forecasters account for low(ish) probability events?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

An inductive learning intervention to improve news veracity discernment.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Forgetting and blame: When cognitive lapses excuse and when they backfire.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same journal

Predecisional distortion of risk information seen in icon arrays.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
See all related articles

Participants update spatial information in augmented reality. Naive users rely on environment-stabilized frames, while experienced users shift to body-stabilized frames for better spatial updating.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Spatial updating is crucial for navigation and interaction in virtual and augmented reality (AR).
  • Understanding how humans maintain spatial representations when their orientation changes is key for AR system design.
  • Previous research suggests different reference frames (environment-stabilized vs. body-stabilized) are used for spatial memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how users perform spatial updating of virtual objects in augmented reality environments.
  • To examine the influence of differing headings (learning, actual, imagined) on pointing accuracy and latency.
  • To determine if user experience and instruction affect the reference frame used for spatial updating.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three experiments were conducted involving participants learning object locations in AR.
  • Participants were blindfolded and rotated to different facing directions before making pointing judgments.
  • Key manipulations included angular differences between learning, actual, and imagined headings.

    • Main Results:

    • Naive users showed longer pointing latencies when the actual and imagined headings differed, suggesting an environment-stabilized frame.
    • This effect of actual-imagined heading difference on latency disappeared with brief training or instruction.
    • Trained or instructed users demonstrated performance consistent with a body-stabilized reference frame.

    Conclusions:

    • Naive users initially adopt an environment-stabilized reference frame for spatial updating in AR.
    • With experience or explicit instruction, users can shift to a more adaptive body-stabilized reference frame.
    • This highlights the plasticity of spatial representations and has implications for AR interface design and user training.