Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Mehran Anvari1, Daniel W Birch, Fahad Bamehriz

  • 1Centre for Minimal Access Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. anvari@mcmaster.ca

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
|December 16, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-reported outcomes after antrum resection versus antrum preservation in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association·2026
Same author

Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid Use in Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Obesity surgery·2026
Same author

Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Outcomes Associated With Bariatric Surgery: A Matched Cohort Study.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Effects of sleeve gastrectomy on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2026
Same author

Patient Perspectives on AI-Powered Medical Robots in Breast and Prostate Cancer Care: Qualitative Study.

JMIR cancer·2026
Same author

Association Between Bariatric Surgery and the Long-Term Risk for Venous Thromboembolism: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study.

American journal of hematology·2026
Same journal

Laparoscopic Intragastric Submucosal Dissection (LISD) for Early Gastric Cancer: An Organ-Preserving Alternative When ESD Is Not Feasible.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

The Ring of Protection Sign: A Novel Ultrasound Marker to Standardize Hydrodissection Safety in Thermal Ablation of Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Sac Excision at the Time of Surgery Can Predict Hernia Recurrences and a Need for Reoperation in Patients.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of PET/CT for the Detection of Synchronous Malignant Lesions in Patients With Endoscopically Obstructive Colorectal Cancer.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Single-Port Robotic Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Novel Approach With FishBowl-Early Case Series.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same journal

Real-World Outcomes of Barbed Versus Interrupted Sutures for Laparoscopic Choledochotomy: A 12-Month Follow-Up in Patients With Choledocholithiasis.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
See all related articles

Robot-assisted colorectal surgery shows promise, with no complications or mortality in initial cases. Operative time decreased with experience, but further studies are needed to confirm benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Colorectal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery has limitations.
  • Robotic assistance may overcome these limitations.
  • The role of robotic assistance in colorectal surgery is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the initial experience with robot-assisted colon resections.
  • To compare outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery with conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective follow-up of 10 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (Zeus Microwrist System).
  • Comparison with 10 consecutive patients undergoing standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
  • Six patients in each group had surgery for colorectal malignancy.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All 10 robotic procedures were completed without intraoperative complications, conversions, or mortality.
  • Average blood loss was <150 mL.
  • Morbidity and hospital stay were comparable to standard laparoscopic procedures.
  • Operative time was significantly increased by ~1 hour but improved after the first 4 cases.

Conclusions:

  • Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and safe in initial cases.
  • Operative time can be reduced with experience.
  • Larger comparative studies are needed to fully evaluate the value of robotic assistance in colorectal surgery.