Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Issues in violent risk assessment: lessons learned and future directions.

Daryl G Kroner¹

¹Pittsburgh Institution, Kingston, Canada.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

|December 17, 2004

Summary

Violent risk assessment has improved by moving beyond simple yes/no predictions. Focusing on measurable outcomes and using receiver operating characteristic analysis enhances prediction accuracy for violence risk.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Council of State Governments Justice Center Approach to Increasing Risk-Level Consistency in the Application of Risk Assessment Instruments.

Assessment·2020

Same author

Service Needs Inventory: Development, reliability, and preliminary validity.

Psychological services·2020

Same author

Risk assessment tool floundering? Let's ask the client to self-predict.

International journal of law and psychiatry·2020

Same author

Taking the Bite out of Mosquito Bites: The Role of Perceived Risk.

International journal of environmental health research·2020

Same author

A Principled Approach to the Construction of Risk Assessment Categories: The Council of State Governments Justice Center Five-Level System.

International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology·2019

Same author

Development of Attribution-Based Scales Associated With Proactive, Reactive, and Acquisitive Offending.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2018

Area of Science:

Criminology
Forensic Psychology
Psychiatry

Background:

Traditional yes/no assessments of dangerousness are inadequate for violent risk assessment.
The past two decades have highlighted the limitations of simplistic approaches to predicting violence.
Improved understanding necessitates examining specific outcomes and their measurable indicators.

Purpose of the Study:

To review advancements in violent risk assessment methodologies.
To highlight the importance of outcome specification and indicator measurement.
To introduce receiver operating characteristic analysis as a key innovation.

Main Methods:

Review of literature on violent risk assessment.
Analysis of methodological innovations, particularly in outcome measurement.
Application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for evaluating prediction efficiency.

Main Results:

The shift from binary (yes/no) dangerousness assessments to nuanced outcome-based evaluations significantly improves risk assessment.
Receiver operating characteristic analysis has emerged as a powerful tool for assessing the efficiency of violent risk prediction models.
Methodological rigor in defining and measuring risk factors enhances predictive accuracy.

Conclusions:

Future violent risk assessment should prioritize mechanism-driven strategies for risk management.
Maintaining a balance between predicting violence and explaining its underlying mechanisms is crucial.
Continued methodological innovation is essential for advancing the field of violence risk assessment.

Related Experiment Videos