Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 20, 2026

Extinction Training During the Reconsolidation Window Prevents Recovery of Fear
Published on: August 24, 2012
Consolidation-like effects in flashbulb memories: evidence from September 11, 2001
Charles A Weaver1, Kevin S Krug
1Baylor University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Waco, TX 76798, USA. CharlesWeaver@Baylor.edu
Abstract:
After September 11, 2001, we distributed flashbulb memory questionnaires at 5 different dates: within 48 hr (T1) and at 1 week (T2), 1 month (T3), 3 months (T4), and 1 year (T5). We scored responses for self-reported memory (veracity unverified), memory accuracy (recollection-matched T1 response), and memory consistency (recollection-matched prior responses other than T1). Self-reported memory and subjective confidence remained near ceiling, although the accuracy declined. However, memories given a week or more after September 11 were consistent throughout. We hypothesize that flashbulb memories follow a consolidation-like process: Some details learned later are incorporated into the initial memory, and many others are discarded. After this process, memories stabilize. Therefore, the best predictor of flashbulb memories at long intervals is not the memory as initially reported but memories reported a week or more after the event.
Related Concept Videos
Flashbulb Memory
Traumatic Memory
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events, are a...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Autobiographical Memory

