Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Reciprocal strategies for large groups.

C D Parks¹, S S Komorita

¹Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. parkscd@mail.wsu.edu

Personality and Social Psychology Review : an Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc

|January 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Predicting relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior: a multiple regression approach.

Behavioural pharmacology·2000

Same author

Keratoconjunctivitis sicca with associated secondary uveitis elicited in rats after systemic xylazine/ketamine anesthesia.

Experimental eye research·1989

Same author

Chemical marker for the differentiation of group A and group B streptococci by pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Analytical chemistry·1987

Same author

Components of reward in social dilemmas.

Journal of personality and social psychology·1985

Same author

An equal excess model of coalition formation.

Behavioral science·1979

Same author

Social transactions.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1976

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Group-based reciprocal strategies (GBRS) can foster cooperation in large groups, unlike individual-based methods. Simulations show GBRS yield higher payoffs, with faction size adapting to temptation to defect.

Area of Science:

Social Psychology
Game Theory
Computational Social Science

Background:

Individual-based reciprocal strategies effectively promote cooperation in small groups.
Cooperation in large groups remains a challenge for traditional reciprocal strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce and evaluate group-based reciprocal strategies (GBRS) for fostering cooperation in large groups.
To determine the impact of payoff matrix structures on GBRS effectiveness.
To explore heuristic strategies for enhancing cooperative outcomes.

Main Methods:

Computer simulations involving 100-member groups were conducted.
Comparison of GBRS payoff against other mixed-motive strategies.
Analysis of faction size dynamics based on varying temptation-to-defect levels.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

GBRS significantly outperformed other mixed-motive strategies in accumulating payoffs.
Optimal faction size for reciprocation depends on the temptation to defect.
A 'win-cooperate, lose-defect' heuristic strategy led to substantial total outcomes.

Conclusions:

GBRS offer a viable mechanism for achieving cooperation in large social dilemmas.
The structure of the payoff matrix critically influences the dynamics of cooperative factions.
Psychological factors warrant further empirical investigation to understand cooperation facilitation.