Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications.

Robin Whittemore1

  • 1Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. robin.whittemore@yale.edu

Nursing Research
|February 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tailoring Teaching of Diabetes Self-management Behaviors for Adults Facing Social and Economic Challenges: A Qualitative Study.

Diabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic CARE·2026
Same author

Associations Between Sleep Quality and Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of sleep research·2026
Same author

Living with type 1 diabetes mellitus: experiences of Colombian teenagers and parents.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P·2026
Same author

The Mediating Effects of Diabetes Self-Management on the Relationship Between Diabetes Distress and Quality of Life Among School-Age Children With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Pediatric diabetes·2026
Same author

Evaluation of the implementation of a patient portal pilot intervention among people with type 2 diabetes at community health centers.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare·2026
Same author

Protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study of mindfulness-based therapy for insomnia in Black women.

Contemporary clinical trials·2025

This study clarifies different research review methods, including integrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Understanding these distinct approaches enhances the rigor and applicability of research findings in healthcare practice and policy.

Area of Science:

  • Health Sciences
  • Nursing Research

Background:

  • The increasing volume of healthcare research necessitates effective review methods.
  • Inconsistent terminology and methods across review types (e.g., integrative, systematic, meta-analysis) hinder clarity.
  • Existing literature lacks clear differentiation between various research review methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize and clarify the distinct characteristics of different research review methods.
  • To identify common stages and quality criteria applicable to all research reviews.
  • To address specific issues related to combining primary nursing research studies.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive analysis and synthesis of existing literature on research review methodologies.
  • Focused examination of methods for integrating primary nursing research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Detailed descriptions of the defining characteristics for various research review methods.
  • Identification of universal stages and quality evaluation criteria for all research reviews.
  • Clarification of the unique purpose, sampling, definition, and analysis for each review type.

Conclusions:

  • Enhanced understanding of research review methods can improve methodological rigor.
  • Clearer differentiation of review types can increase the applicability of findings to practice and policy.
  • Standardized terminology and methods are crucial for advancing evidence-based healthcare.