Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional blink differences between adolescent dyslexic and normal readers.

Guy L Lacroix1, Ioana Constantinescu, Denis Cousineau

  • 1Department of Psychology, Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, Que., Canada H4B 1R6. glacroix@education.concordia.ca

Brain and Cognition
|February 15, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

The Creative Space Theory as a map to explore the mind.

Possibility studies & society·2026
Same author

Do You See the Difference Between Perfection and Excellence?

Psychology research and behavior management·2026
Same author

The relation of spatial skills, spatial memory span, and two anxiety types with statistics anxiety in European and North American University students.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026
Same author

How to sneeze a napkin off the table: Understanding grammatically creative, coerced sentences in real time.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Metaphors in context and in isolation: Familiarity, aptness, concreteness, metaphoricity, and structure norms for 300 two-word expressions.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Individuals with dyslexia showed a shallower attentional blink, suggesting different working memory and episodic memory encoding compared to typical readers. This finding offers new insights into developmental dyslexia.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience of reading disorders

Background:

  • Developmental dyslexia is a common reading disorder.
  • The role of working memory in dyslexia is debated.
  • Attentional blink (AB) is a measure of visual attention limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if dyslexic individuals require more working memory resources than normal readers to shift attention.
  • To compare attentional blink performance between dyslexic and normal readers.

Main Methods:

  • Adolescents with and without dyslexia participated in the study.
  • A Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) paradigm was employed to measure the attentional blink.
  • Participants were tasked with identifying targets within a rapidly presented sequence of stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Contrary to hypotheses, dyslexic participants exhibited a shallower attentional blink than normal controls.
  • This suggests dyslexic individuals may have different attentional processing or working memory resource allocation.
  • The findings indicate potential differences in episodic memory encoding between the two groups.

Conclusions:

  • The results challenge the notion that dyslexia is solely due to deficits in working memory for attentional shifting.
  • A shallower attentional blink in dyslexia may reflect distinct information encoding strategies in episodic memory.
  • These findings support a cascade-effect perspective in understanding developmental dyslexia.