Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Is open appendectomy still up-to-date?].

R Näf1, P Buchmann

  • 1Chirurgische Klinik, Stadtspital Waid, Zürich. remo.naef@waid.stzh.ch

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue Therapeutique
|March 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Formation of ridges in a stable lithosphere in mantle convection models with a viscoplastic rheology.

Geophysical research letters·2016
Same author

Allergen-specific T cell responses to immunotherapy monitored by CD154 and intracellular cytokine expression.

Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology·2010
Same author

[The complicated stoma--late complications, conservative and surgical management].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2007
Same author

[Adrenalectomy after snowboard fall. A pheochromocytoma becomes clinically apparent in an unusual way].

Der Unfallchirurg·2006
Same author

[Progress of the laparoscopic colorectal surgery with special consideration regarding cancer treatment].

Praxis·2006
Same author

Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2005
Same journal

[Multimodal Cardiac Imaging: New Developments for Clinical Practice].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
Same journal

[Coronary angiography: From cardiac catheterization to advanced interventional cardiovascular imaging].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
Same journal

[Athlete's heart: role of cardiac imaging in the prevention of sudden cardiac death].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
Same journal

[Multimodal imaging in cardiac amyloidosis and cardiac sarcoidosis].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
Same journal

[Inflammatory Heart Disease: The Role of Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in Myocarditis and Pericarditis].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
Same journal

State-of-the-Art Cardiac Imaging

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers benefits like reduced wound infections and faster recovery compared to open surgery. While controversial, it shows comparable costs and improved cosmetic outcomes, with specific indications for complex cases.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy's acceptance remains debated compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Existing studies suggest benefits over open appendectomy, but consensus is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • To compare laparoscopic appendectomy with traditional open appendectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of existing studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
  • Review of complication rates, recovery times, and costs.

Main Results:

  • Lower wound infection rates and comparable complication rates for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reduced postoperative pain, earlier return to work, and better cosmetic results.
  • Comparable operation times, hospital stays, and overall costs.
  • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrates significant advantages in specific patient groups, including those with atypical pain, uncertain diagnoses in women, obesity, and complicated appendicitis.
    • Further controlled double-blinded randomized studies are needed to solidify advantages and define broader indications.