Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Non-fluoroscopic Catheter Tracking for Fluoroscopy Reduction in Interventional Electrophysiology
Published on: May 26, 2015
Right atrial overdrive pacing does not prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery
Tapio Hakala1, Antti J M Valtola, Anu K Turpeinen
1Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 1777, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland. tapio.hakala@kuh.fi
Insights
Atrial overdrive pacing and bradycardia prevention pacing did not effectively prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. These pacing methods showed no significant difference in reducing AF incidence in CABG patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).
- Pacing strategies are being explored to prevent postoperative AF.
- Atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) and bradycardia prevention pacing (BPP) are two such investigated methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of AOP and BPP in preventing AF after CABG.
- To compare the incidence of AF in patients receiving AOP, BPP, or no pacing (NP).
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized study involving 124 on-pump CABG patients.
- Patients were assigned to AOP, BPP, or NP groups.
- Pacing was delivered for 48 hours postoperatively, with AF onset (lasting >5 min) as the primary endpoint.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in AF incidence were observed between the AOP (26.8%), BPP (19.5%), and NP (28.6%) groups.
- Pacing was technically successful in most patients (80.5% for AOP, 92.7% for BPP).
- Inappropriate pacing due to sensing failure may have induced AF in three AOP patients.
Conclusions:
- Neither AOP nor BPP demonstrated effectiveness in preventing AF after CABG.
- Current pacing strategies may not be a viable solution for post-CABG AF prophylaxis.
Aims:
The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) and bradycardia prevention pacing (BPP) in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).
Methods:
One hundred and twenty-four on-pump CABG patients were randomized into three groups: AOP, BPP, and NP (no pacing). AOP patients were paced via epicardial wires using an atrial preference pacing algorithm, and BPP patients were paced in the AAI mode with a base rate of 60/min. Patients were paced for 48 h starting on the first postoperative day. The endpoint of the study was the first onset of AF lasting longer than 5 min.
Results:
Preoperative risk factors and surgical data of patients did not differ between the AOP, BPP and NP groups. Pacing was technically successful in 80.5% of patients in the AOP and in 92.7% in the BPP groups. The incidence of AF in the AOP (26.8%), BPP (19.5%) and NP (28.6%) groups did not differ significantly. In the AOP group, AF in three patients was probably induced by inappropriate pacing due to sensing failure.
Conclusions:
Atrial overdrive pacing and bradycardia prevention pacing were not effective in the prevention of AF after CABG.
Related Concept Videos
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

