Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
Clarifying the role of the "other" category in the self-esteem IAT
Brad Pinter1, Anthony G Greenwald
1The Pennsylvania State University, Altoona College, Altoona, PA 16601, USA. tbp1@psu.edu
Abstract:
A. Karpinski (2004) recently criticized Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures of self-esteem, arguing that their measurements of self-associations are compromised by their contrasting self with a putatively extremely negative second category, the nonspecific other. The present data show, to the contrary, that the nonspecific other category in the self-esteem IAT is near neutral in valence. Validity of the self-esteem IAT is most appropriately assessed by examining its correlations with conceptually related measures. That has been done in several previous studies that are reviewed here. The nonspecific other category is only one of several choices for representing the concept of other in self-esteem IATs. Choice of the appropriate other category to contrast with self in self-esteem IATs should be guided by the needs of the research question being addressed.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Need for Self-Esteem
Protecting Self-Esteem

