Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contrast sensitivity functions to stimuli defined in Cartesian, polar and hyperbolic coordinates.

Y Zana1, A C G T Cavalcanti

  • 1Department of Psychology, CFCH, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife-PE 50670-901, Brazil. zana@ime.usp.br

Spatial Vision
|April 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) in monkeys for different visual stimuli. Cartesian stimuli showed higher peak sensitivity compared to polar and hyperbolic ones.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel polar-based human face recognition computational model.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2009
Same author

Contrast sensitivity to angular frequency gratings is not higher than to Cartesian gratings.

Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas·2004
Same author

Tetrachromatic input to turtle horizontal cells.

Visual neuroscience·2002
Same author

Ultraviolet colour opponency in the turtle retina.

The Journal of experimental biology·2001
Same author

UV responses in the retina of the turtle.

Visual neuroscience·1999

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Electrophysiological studies suggest specific sensitivities in monkey visual cortex (LGN, V1, V2, V4) to various stimulus coordinates.
  • Understanding contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) is crucial for characterizing visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) for stimuli defined in Cartesian, polar, and hyperbolic coordinates.
  • To compare the peak sensitivity and shape of CSFs across these different coordinate systems.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a two-alternatives forced-choice paradigm to measure CSFs.
  • Presented stimuli defined in Cartesian, concentric-Bessel (polar), and radial (hyperbolic) coordinates.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • CSFs for Cartesian, concentric, and hyperbolic stimuli exhibited similar shapes with peak sensitivity around 3 cycles per degree (c/deg).
  • Cartesian stimuli yielded a peak sensitivity at least 0.1 log units higher than other coordinate systems.
  • Concentric-Bessel CSFs showed a low-pass characteristic, while radial CSFs had a bell shape.
  • Only the concentric-Bessel CSF could be explained by Fourier transform components.

Conclusions:

  • Visual cortex exhibits differential contrast sensitivity depending on stimulus coordinate system.
  • Existing neural models do not fully account for the observed CSFs across all tested coordinate systems.
  • Further refinement of neural models is needed to explain visual processing of diverse stimulus geometries.