Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory.

René Zeelenberg1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Woudestein, J5-65, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. zeelenberg@fsw.eur.nl

Acta Psychologica
|April 13, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Words and Worlds Both: Dynamic Effects of Distributional and Sensorimotor Information in Semantic Processing.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Effects of multisensory study on long-term memory for pictures and sounds.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Study-test overlap rather than multisensory integration benefits memory.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

Non-native language comprehenders encode implied shapes of objects in memory.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2024
Same author

NewAbstractConcepts: A Database of 42 Normed Abstract Concepts and Exemplars.

Journal of cognition·2024
Same author

Automatic mental simulation in native and non-native speakers.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same journal

Exploring themes in music therapy: A scoping review.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Human-robot collaboration and customer-directed spillover: A daily diary study of state job apathy.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Feedback is associated with higher subjective values of n-Back levels in effort discounting.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Understanding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in university students: Exploring the roles of neurotic perfectionism, parental perception, and stressful life events.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Tailoring instruction to personality: The mediating role of cognitive tendencies in the effect of extraversion on higher vocational college students' self-regulated learning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Physical activity and loneliness in rural left-behind children: The mediating roles of social anxiety and self-concept.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Encoding specificity manipulations impact memory retrieval, challenging previous findings. New research demonstrates these manipulations affect retrieval even under forced-report recall conditions, refining our understanding of memory processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory Research

Background:

  • The encoding specificity principle explains how retrieval cues affect memory recall.
  • Previous research by Higham (2002) analyzed cued recall using retrieval, monitoring, and report bias.
  • Higham's study suggested encoding specificity manipulations did not affect retrieval under forced-report conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the impact of encoding specificity manipulations on memory retrieval.
  • To address limitations in Higham's (2002) analysis and the Thomson and Tulving (1970) paradigm.
  • To demonstrate that encoding specificity affects retrieval even in forced-report cued recall.

Main Methods:

  • Critiqued Higham's (2002) interpretation of cued recall data.
  • Conducted three experiments using a revised experimental design.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared free-report and forced-report recall instructions to isolate memory components.

    • Main Results:

    • Encoding specificity manipulations were found to significantly affect performance in forced-report cued recall.
    • The confounding factors in the Thomson and Tulving (1970) paradigm were identified and addressed.
    • Contrary to Higham's conclusions, retrieval was shown to be affected by encoding specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • Encoding specificity manipulations do influence memory retrieval.
    • Forced-report recall, when appropriately designed, can provide a measure of retrieval uncontaminated by other memory aspects.
    • The findings necessitate a revision of how encoding specificity impacts memory retrieval processes.