Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Speckle statistics in optical coherence tomography.

Boris Karamata1, Kaï Hassler, Markus Laubscher

  • 1Laboratoire d'Optique Biomédicale, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. boris.karamata@a3.epfl.ch

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision
|April 21, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Open-source microscope add-on for structured illumination microscopy.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Digital aberration correction enhances field of view in visible-light optical coherence microscopy.

Optics letters·2022
Same author

Silicon-Vacancy Nanodiamonds as High Performance Near-Infrared Emitters for Live-Cell Dual-Color Imaging and Thermometry.

Nano letters·2022
Same author

Statistical distortion of supervised learning predictions in optical microscopy induced by image compression.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Identifying microbial species by single-molecule DNA optical mapping and resampling statistics.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2021
Same author

Soliton microcomb based spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Nature communications·2021
Same journal

Multi-module collaborative optimization-driven fast speckle correlation imaging in variable environments.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Secrecy performance analysis of NOMA-UWOC systems over a vertically stratified WGG oceanic turbulence channel.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Backscattering of plane waves in a composite system containing a rough surface and anisotropic scatterers.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Aspherical surface construction methods based on extended Jacobi polynomials.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

OCT sidelobe suppression method based on dual-path phase sinusoidal modulation and minimum value fusion.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
Same journal

Optical design concepts using wavelength-selective diffractive optics to enable miniaturized multimodal endoscopic imaging across separated spectral ranges.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision·2026
See all related articles

Two speckle distribution calculations in optical coherence tomography (OCT) previously yielded different results. A modification to one formulation’s initial assumption reconciles these differences, showing they are equivalent.

Area of Science:

  • Optics and Photonics
  • Biomedical Imaging
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • Two distinct mathematical formulations exist for calculating speckle amplitude distribution in optical coherence tomography (OCT).
  • These formulations have historically produced divergent results, creating ambiguity in speckle analysis.
  • Accurate speckle characterization is crucial for interpreting OCT images and improving diagnostic capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reconcile the differing results from two established mathematical formulations for OCT speckle amplitude distribution.
  • To demonstrate the equivalence of the two formulations through a specific mathematical adjustment.
  • To provide a unified understanding of speckle statistics in OCT imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two existing mathematical models for speckle amplitude distribution in OCT.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and modification of a key initial assumption in one of the formulations.
  • Mathematical derivation to demonstrate the convergence of results post-modification.

    • Main Results:

    • A specific modification to an initial assumption in one formulation was identified.
    • This modification successfully aligned the results of the two previously disparate calculation methods.
    • The amplitude distribution of speckles in OCT is shown to be consistent across both formulations after adjustment.

    Conclusions:

    • The two previously reported calculations for OCT speckle amplitude distribution are mathematically equivalent.
    • A revised understanding of the underlying assumptions resolves discrepancies in speckle analysis.
    • This finding simplifies the theoretical framework for OCT speckle quantification and interpretation.