Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Simultaneous Electrocardiography Recording and Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement in Rats
Published on: January 31, 2019
Differential acquisition of specific components of a classically conditioned arterial blood pressure response in rat
Yasser M El-Wazir1, Sheng-Gang Li, Daniel T Williams
1Dept. of Physiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, USA. randall@uky.edu
Abstract:
Presenting a 15-s pulsed tone, the conditional stimulus (CS(+)), followed by 0.5-s tail shock, to a well-trained rat causes a sudden, but transient, pressor response (C(1)). Blood pressure (BP) then drops before increasing again (C(2)). A steady tone of the same frequency never followed by a shock (a discriminative stimulus, or CS(-)) evokes a C(1) but not a C(2) response. Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis that this BP response pattern does not depend on the nature of the tone (i.e., pulsed vs. steady) used for CS(+) and CS(-). The tones were reversed from the traditional paradigm, above, in nine rats. The C(1) BP increase for a steady-tone CS(+) (+4.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg, mean change +/- SE) and a pulsed CS(-) (+2.9 +/- 1.3 mmHg) did not differ. Conversely, C(2) showed a clear discrimination (CS(+): +5.1 +/- 1.2 mmHg, CS(-): +0 .7 +/- 0.8 mmHg; P < 0.05). Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that the C(1) and C(2) BP responses first appear at different times during training. On training day 1, five 15-s pulsed tones (CS(+)) were presented to each of 18 rats; the last tone was followed by a tail shock. Likewise, five steady CS(-) tones never followed by shock were given. Training continued for 2 more days, with each CS(+) followed by shock. At the end of day 2, CS(+) evoked a C(1) BP response (+3.9 +/- 0.9 mmHg) but no C(2) (+0.6 +/- 0.4 mmHg, not significant vs. pretone). By the end of day 3, CS(+) evoked a significant (vs. baseline) C(1) (+7.3 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and C(2) (+3.3 +/- 0.8 mmHg). Conversely, although CS(-) evoked a C(1) response (3.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg), there was no C(2) (+0.7 +/- 0.5 mmHg; not significant). We conclude that 1) C(1) and C(2) are acquired at different rates, 2) early in training C(1) is an orienting response evoked by both tones, and 3) C(2) is only acquired as an animal learns to associate the CS(+) tone with shock. This suggests that C(1) and C(2) are controlled by different processes in the brain.
More Related Videos
11:08Novel Approach for Simultaneous Recording of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity and Blood Pressure with Intravenous Infusion in Conscious, Unrestrained Mice.
Published on: February 14, 2018
10:28Evaluation of Vascular Control Mechanisms Utilizing Video Microscopy of Isolated Resistance Arteries of Rats
Published on: December 5, 2017