Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

08:18
Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System (FFS) for the Quantification of Methane Emissions
Published on: June 12, 2016
Compressed natural gas bus safety: a quantitative risk assessment
Samuel Chamberlain1, Mohammad Modarres
1Center for Technology Risk Studies, University of Maryland, 2100 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Summary
Compressed natural gas (CNG) school buses show a higher fire fatality risk than diesel buses. Key risks stem from pressure relief valves, CNG cylinders, and fuel piping failures.
Area of Science:
- Transportation Safety
- Risk Assessment
- Alternative Fuels
Background:
- Compressed natural gas (CNG) is an alternative fuel for vehicles, including school buses.
- Assessing the fire safety risks of emerging technologies like CNG buses is crucial due to limited historical data.
- Diesel school buses represent a mature technology with available historical safety performance data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the fire safety risks of compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicle systems, specifically school buses and their fuel infrastructure.
- To determine the sensitivity of fire safety risks to component failure rates and fire event consequences.
- To identify critical components and subsystems contributing most to fire safety risk.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) approach to model and predict fire safety risks for CNG buses.
- Employed generic failure data, engineering judgments, and assumptions due to limited real-world experience with CNG bus fleets.
- Compared predicted risks with historical fire safety data from diesel-fueled school buses.
Main Results:
- Predicted mean fire fatality risk for typical CNG buses is approximately 0.23 fatalities per 100-million miles (all persons) and 0.16 fatalities per 100-million miles (passengers only).
- Diesel school buses have a mean fire fatality risk of 0.091 (all persons) and 0.0007 (passengers) per 100-million miles.
- CNG buses exhibit a 2.5 times higher fire fatality risk than diesel buses, with passengers being over two orders of magnitude more at risk.
Conclusions:
- CNG school buses present a significantly higher fire fatality risk compared to diesel buses.
- Failure rates of pressure relief valves, CNG cylinders, and fuel piping are the most influential factors in CNG bus fire risk.
- Further safety enhancements for CNG bus systems should focus on these critical components.

