Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Last word: imagining the future.

Ronald M Green1

  • 1Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
|May 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Don't abandon 14-day limit on embryo research, it makes sense.

Nature·2021
Same author

When pregnancy is a research risk.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2020
Same author

COVID-19 and Religious Ethics.

The Journal of religious ethics·2020
Same author

Are babies by design in our future?

Personalized medicine·2018
Same author

Neural Technologies: The Ethics of Intimate Access to the Mind.

The Hastings Center report·2015
Same author

Comment.

Xenotransplantation·2015
Same journal

On the Dangers of Cancer Exceptionalism in Pain Medicine.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Suck It Up and Stay on the Grind: Ethical Considerations Surrounding Trust, Chronic Pain, and the American Workplace.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

<i>Morbus Mediterraneus</i>: A Cultural Alibi for an Unequal Pain Burden.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

Beyond Words: A Philosophical Analysis of the Linguistic Refractoriness of Chronic Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

When "Good-Enough" Treatment Is Not Good Enough: Epistemic Injustice, Pain-Related Motivational Deficit, and Epistemic Deflection in the Treatment of Gynecological Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same journal

The Silent Struggle: A Woman's Journey Through Pain.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
See all related articles

H.G. Wells foresaw that severe economic disparities could alter human biology. This warning is crucial today with advancements in human genome biotechnologies and enhancement debates.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Human Biology
  • Genomic Science

Background:

  • H.G. Wells's 1895 warning regarding economic injustice and human biology.
  • The increasing societal consideration of biotechnologies for human genome manipulation.
  • The ethical implications of using genetic technologies for human enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate H.G. Wells's historical warning in the context of modern biotechnology.
  • To explore the potential biological consequences of unchecked economic disparities.
  • To discuss the ethical considerations surrounding human genome enhancement.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of H.G. Wells's writings.
  • Review of current biotechnological capabilities.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical framework analysis of human genome manipulation.

    • Main Results:

    • Wells's warning about economic injustice transforming human biology remains relevant.
    • Biotechnologies offer unprecedented potential for human genome manipulation.
    • Significant ethical challenges arise from potential human enhancement.

    Conclusions:

    • The intersection of economic injustice and human biology requires careful consideration.
    • Advancements in biotechnology necessitate robust ethical guidelines for human genome editing.
    • Societal decisions on human enhancement must address potential biological and ethical ramifications.