Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading.

Henrik Helin1, Mikael Lundin, Johan Lundin

  • 1Institute of Medical Technology, Tampere University and University Hospital, 33014 Tampere, Finland.

Human Pathology
|May 14, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Finding Holes: Pathologist-Level Performance Using AI for Cribriform Morphology Detection in Prostate Cancer.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Fiber type-specific expression of LACTB leverages a function in oxidative metabolism.

Histochemistry and cell biology·2026
Same author

Validation of conformal prediction in cervical atypia classification.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Bridging the analog divide: a comparison of printed X-ray films and digital images when using computer-aided detection software for tuberculosis screening.

BMC global and public health·2026
Same author

AI-Supported Digital Microscopy Diagnostics in Primary Health Care Laboratories: Scoping Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

European Study of Prostate Cancer Screening - 23-Year Follow-up.

The New England journal of medicine·2025
Same journal

TRPS1 and GATA3 Expression in BRG1/SMARCA4-deficient Malignant Neoplasms.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characteristics of Acral Melanomas Harboring RARA Fusions.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Clinical Impact of Second Opinion Consultation in Bladder Biopsies and Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic relevance and molecular correlates of Claudin-1 expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia: Lineage Assignment, Immunophenotypic Classification and Genetic Insights.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia revisited: A comprehensive review with emphasis on the oligomonocytic subtype.

Human pathology·2026
See all related articles

Web-based virtual microscopy improves Gleason grading accuracy for prostate cancer. This interactive tool enhances learning and standardization, overcoming limitations of traditional glass slides for better diagnostic consistency.

Area of Science:

  • Uropathology
  • Digital Pathology
  • Medical Education

Background:

  • Gleason grading is crucial for prostate cancer assessment but suffers from subjectivity and interobserver variability.
  • Conventional microscopy limits educational value due to fixed magnification and navigation constraints.
  • Virtual microscopy offers a solution by enabling interactive viewing of digitized slides.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the validity of Web-based virtual microscopy for improving Gleason grading.
  • To assess the accuracy and consistency of Gleason grading using digital pathology tools.
  • To develop an educational platform for Gleason grading self-testing and learning.

Main Methods:

  • An interactive website (www.webmicroscope.net/gleason) was developed with digitized prostatic needle biopsy virtual slides.

Related Experiment Videos

  • An experienced uropathologist scored 62 biopsies using both traditional glass slides and virtual slides.
  • Interobserver agreement was assessed among three uropathologists using the virtual slide platform.

    • Main Results:

    • Excellent intraobserver agreement (kappa = 0.73) was achieved when scoring virtual slides compared to glass slides.
    • Differences in scores between virtual and glass slides were minimal (1 point on the Gleason scale).
    • Interobserver agreement coefficients (0.55-0.62) were comparable to studies using glass slides.

    Conclusions:

    • Web-based virtual microscopy is a valid and promising tool for Gleason grading.
    • This technology can enhance the teaching and standardization of prostate cancer grading.
    • The developed platform serves as an open resource for uropathologists to improve their grading skills.