Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Speech-specific auditory processing: where is it?

Cathy Price1, Guillaume Thierry, Tim Griffiths

  • 1Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. c.price@fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|June 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Supporting recruitment into complex trials: An embedded qualitative process evaluation in the RADICAL trial of radiofrequency denervation for chronic low back pain.

British journal of pain·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Intradiscal linezolid (PP353) treatment for chronic low back pain associated with Modic change type 1: an international, first-in-human, randomised, sham procedure-controlled, double-blind, phase 1b clinical trial' eClinicalMedicine 2026; 92: 103764.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Intradiscal linezolid (PP353) treatment for chronic low back pain associated with Modic change type 1: an international, first-in-human, randomised, sham procedure-controlled, double-blind, phase 1b clinical trial.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Affective Modulation of Cross-Language Activation is Domain General.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same author

Foreign cultural norms are better accepted in the second language.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2025
Same author

Predicting speech-in-noise ability with static and dynamic auditory figure-ground analysis using structural equation modelling.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Brain regions processing auditory speech are not speech-specific but respond to various sounds and concepts. Speech processing emerges from shared auditory and conceptual functions, challenging dedicated brain region models.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Auditory Processing

Background:

  • The localization of speech-specific processing in the brain remains debated.
  • Current models consider either dedicated cortical regions or developmental plasticity in non-dedicated areas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-classify brain regions activated by auditory speech processing.
  • To investigate whether speech processing relies on dedicated regions or shared cognitive functions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of brain regions activated during auditory speech processing.
  • Classification of these regions based on their response to non-verbal sounds, pitch changes, melodies, and conceptual tasks.

Main Results:

  • Brain regions activated by speech processing can be re-classified based on responses to diverse auditory and conceptual stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evidence suggests speech processing emerges from differential demands on shared auditory and conceptual processes.

    • Conclusions:

    • Speech processing is not confined to speech-specific brain regions.
    • The findings support process-specific cognitive models over domain-specific ones, highlighting the integration of general cognitive functions for speech comprehension.