Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

Methodology for the Study of Horizontal Gene Transfer in Staphylococcus aureus
Published on: March 10, 2017
Incidence of inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci: first results from Turkey
O K Azap1, H Arslan, F Timurkaynak
1Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey. okurtazap@baskent-ank.edu.tr
Abstract:
In total, 408 staphylococcal isolates were tested for inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) by the disk-diffusion induction test (D-test). ICR was detected in 5.7% of 105 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, 3.6% of 111 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates, 30.8% of 94 methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) isolates, and 11.2% of 98 methicillin-sensitive CoNS isolates. All MRSA isolates that were erythromycin-resistant and clindamycin-susceptible were positive by the D-test. The same results were obtained with an azithromycin instead of an erythromycin disk. All isolates were susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin. The cost-benefit of the d-test should be evaluated locally after determining the incidence of the different resistance phenotypes.
Insights
Inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) was detected in Staphylococcus isolates using the D-test. Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci showed the highest ICR rates, highlighting the need for local D-test evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus species is a growing public health concern.
- Accurate detection of inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) is crucial for effective treatment of staphylococcal infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance (ICR) in various Staphylococcus isolates.
- To evaluate the efficacy of the disk-diffusion induction test (D-test) for detecting ICR.
Main Methods:
- Tested 408 staphylococcal isolates (MRSA, MSSA, MR-CoNS, MS-CoNS) for ICR using the D-test.
- Utilized erythromycin or azithromycin disks in conjunction with clindamycin disks.
Main Results:
- ICR was detected in 5.7% of MRSA, 3.6% of MSSA, 30.8% of MR-CoNS, and 11.2% of MS-CoNS isolates.
- All erythromycin-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible MRSA isolates were positive by D-test.
- All isolates remained susceptible to quinupristin-dalfopristin.
Conclusions:
- Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci exhibited the highest rates of inducible clindamycin resistance.
- The D-test is effective in identifying ICR in Staphylococcus isolates.
- Local evaluation of the D-test's cost-benefit is recommended based on observed resistance phenotypes.
Related Concept Videos
Antibiotic Selection
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

