Related Experiment Videos
Physician responses to ambiguous patient symptoms
David B Seaburn1, Diane Morse, Susan H McDaniel
1School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. david_seaburn@urmc.rochester.edu
Journal of General Internal Medicine
|July 1, 2005
Summary
Primary care physicians either ignore ambiguous symptoms or explore them further. High partnering (HP) involves acknowledging ambiguity and patient concerns, while usual care (UC) dismisses it.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Patient-Physician Communication
- Primary Care Research
Background:
- Ambiguous patient symptoms present a diagnostic challenge in primary care.
- Physician responses to these ambiguous presentations can significantly impact patient interaction and care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how primary care physicians (PCPs) manage ambiguous patient symptom presentations.
- To identify distinct patterns in physician-patient interactions during these encounters.
Main Methods:
- An observational study utilizing standardized patients (SPs) in community-based primary care offices.
- Thematic analysis of audiotaped and transcribed physician-patient encounters.
- Development of a coding system to analyze physician responses to ambiguity.
Main Results:
- Two primary physician response patterns emerged: high partnering (HP) and usual care (UC).
- HP physicians showed greater responsiveness to patient concerns, acknowledged ambiguity, and explored patient perspectives.
- UC physicians tended to deny ambiguity and involve patients less in understanding their symptoms.
Conclusions:
- PCPs adopt either a directive approach (UC) by ignoring ambiguity or an exploratory approach (HP) by acknowledging and investigating it.
- Further research is needed to determine if HP behaviors are teachable and if they improve health outcomes.