Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

07:22
Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence for the Evaluation of Retinal Diseases
Published on: March 11, 2016
Visual functioning and quality of life in the SubFoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS): SFRADS report 2
M R Stevenson1, P M Hart, U Chakravarthy
1Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Royal Hospitals, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK.
The British Journal of Ophthalmology
|July 19, 2005
Summary
External beam radiotherapy did not improve self-reported visual functioning or quality of life in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study found no significant differences between treated and untreated groups in daily living tasks or overall health.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Radiation Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of vision loss.
- Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) is a common complication of AMD.
- External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is being investigated as a potential treatment for CNV.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of 12 Gy EBRT in improving self-reported visual functioning and quality of life in patients with AMD-related CNV.
- To compare outcomes between patients treated with EBRT and an observation control group.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, single-masked, randomised controlled trial involving 199 patients aged 60+ with subfoveal CNV and visual acuity ≥ 6/60.
- Participants were assigned to receive 12 Gy EBRT or observation.
- Visual function, ophthalmic examinations, and patient-reported outcomes (DLTV and SF-36 questionnaires) were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Main Results:
- Both groups experienced a decline in visual functioning as measured by the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision (DLTV) questionnaire.
- No statistically significant differences were observed in DLTV scores between the EBRT and observation groups at 12 or 24 months.
- Regression analysis indicated that treatment status did not influence changes in DLTV scores.
Conclusions:
- Despite potential minor clinical vision improvements, 12 Gy EBRT did not lead to better self-reported visual functioning or quality of life in AMD patients compared to observation.
- These findings suggest that EBRT may not be an effective treatment for improving patient-centered outcomes in this population.
- The results have implications for designing future clinical trials and therapeutic strategies for AMD-related CNV.

