Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making better decisions: from measuring to constructing preferences.

Eric J Johnson1, Mary Steffel, Daniel G Goldstein

  • 1Center for Decision Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. ejj3@columbia.edu

Health Psychology : Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
|July 28, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a science of human-AI teaming for decision making: A complementarity framework.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Measuring population heterogeneity requires heterogeneous populations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024
Same author

Dark defaults: How choice architecture steers political campaign donations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

When nudges have societal-level impact.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

An illusion of predictability in scientific results: Even experts confuse inferential uncertainty and outcome variability.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same journal

Peer racial representation at school, social experiences, and inflammation among Black adolescents.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Association of basal reproduction hormone status with the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: The moderating effect of psychological factors.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Capturing wear in wear and tear: The negative-affect reactivity linked to discrimination is associated with biological age across two national samples of adults in the United States.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Personality moderates immunological and functional consequences of caregiver burden.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Daily-level associations between sleep hygiene, cannabis use, and sleep health outcomes.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same journal

Clinically effective child change in family-based behavioral treatment for pediatric obesity: An individual participant mega-analysis.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
See all related articles

Understanding how medical decisions are made is key. This study suggests that how patient preferences are measured can influence reported outcomes, proposing methods like smart default options and preference-building environments to improve medical decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Current models of medical decision making often assume stable patient preferences.
  • The measurement process itself can influence the preferences reported by patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how a constructive preferences perspective can alter the understanding of medical decision making.
  • To propose and evaluate methods for improving patient preference measurement and decision outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the impact of preference measurement techniques on reported patient preferences.
  • Focused on two key techniques: strategic selection of default options and structured preference-construction environments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Default options can be effective when clinical evidence strongly supports a treatment for the majority, while still allowing patient choice.
  • Environments facilitating preference construction are beneficial when patients need to understand complex probabilities and outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The way patient preferences are elicited significantly impacts medical decision-making.
  • Implementing informed defaults and supportive choice environments can lead to better patient outcomes and more accurate preference reporting.