Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bar code technology improves positive patient identification and transfusion safety.

S G Sandler1, A Langeberg, L Dohnalek

  • 1Departments of Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, and Nursing Services, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA. sandlerg@gunet.georgetown.edu

Developments in Biologicals
|July 30, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Barcode transfusion safety systems achieve 100% accuracy in matching patients, blood samples, and components. This technology offers a preferred alternative to manual checks for nurses, enhancing patient safety in blood transfusions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rh immune globulin: an interfering substance in compatibility testing.

Immunohematology·2019
Same author

DEL phenotype.

Immunohematology·2017
Same author

Bloody Brilliant: A History of Blood Groups and Blood Groupers.

Immunohematology·2017
Same author

Immunosuppressive protocols for transplantation and certain hematologic malignancies can prevent the primary immune response to the D blood group antigen.

Immunohematology·2013
Same author

Education in transfusion medicine for medical students and doctors.

Vox sanguinis·2013
Same author

Laboratory methods for Rh immunoprophylaxis: a review.

Immunohematology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Medical technology
  • Patient safety
  • Health informatics

Background:

  • Human error in blood transfusions leads to significant patient safety risks.
  • Failure to correctly identify patients, samples, and blood components is a primary cause of transfusion errors.
  • Current identification methods are prone to errors, necessitating improved safety protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a point-of-care barcode transfusion safety system.
  • To assess the accuracy of matching patients, blood samples, and blood components using barcode technology.
  • To compare nurse preference for barcode verification versus traditional visual checks.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a barcode transfusion safety system linking patient wristbands, blood sample tubes, blood component bags, and nurse identification badges.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing point-of-care barcode scanning for verification at critical steps.
  • Collecting data on matching accuracy and nurse feedback on the system.

    • Main Results:

    • Achieved 100% accuracy in matching patients, blood samples, and blood components for transfusions.
    • Nurses preferred barcode verification ('double checks') over conventional visual verification by a second nurse.
    • The system demonstrated a significant improvement in transfusion safety.

    Conclusions:

    • Barcode transfusion safety systems are highly effective in preventing transfusion errors.
    • Technological solutions like barcode scanning enhance patient identification and component matching.
    • Training is essential to maintain nurse proficiency with barcode systems, especially for infrequent transfusions.