Related Experiment Videos
Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. II: Experience with 25 low-profile explants
V M Walley1, C A Keon, M Khalili
1Department of Pathology, University of Ottawa, Canada.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|July 1, 1992
Summary
Low-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves showed higher failure rates due to cusp tears, especially in the mitral position. These bioprosthetic valves also failed sooner than standard-profile versions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Medical Device Engineering
Background:
- The Ionescu-Shiley valve is a bioprosthetic cardiac valve used in aortic and mitral positions.
- Bioprosthetic valve failure, particularly cusp tears leading to insufficiency, is a significant clinical concern.
- Understanding failure modes is crucial for improving long-term device performance and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the explantation reasons and failure patterns of low-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves.
- To compare the failure characteristics of low-profile valves with standard-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves.
- To identify potential implications for future bioprosthetic valve design.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of patients with explanted low-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves (237 aortic, 130 mitral).
- Analysis of explantation reasons, focusing on cusp tears and valvular insufficiency.
- Morphologic examination of explanted valves.
- Comparison of failure data with historical data from standard-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves.
Main Results:
- Valvular insufficiency due to cusp tears was the primary reason for explantation (50% aortic, 82% mitral).
- Low-profile valves failed significantly sooner than standard-profile valves (mean 45.1 vs. 78.0 months in aortic; 52.2 vs. 73.8 months in mitral).
- Mitral valve failures due to tears were proportionally more common in the low-profile group compared to the standard-profile group.
Conclusions:
- Low-profile Ionescu-Shiley valves exhibit distinct failure patterns, primarily cusp tears, with a higher incidence in the mitral position.
- These valves demonstrate a shorter in situ lifespan compared to their standard-profile counterparts.
- Findings suggest a need for design modifications in future bioprosthetic valves to enhance durability and longevity.