Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structure sensitivity in third-harmonic generation microscopy.

Delphine Débarre1, Willy Supatto, Emmanuel Beaurepaire

  • 1Laboratory for Optics and Biosciences, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France.

Optics Letters
|September 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bacterial exploration of solid/liquid interfaces: developing platforms to control the physicochemical microenvironment.

The European physical journal. E, Soft matter·2025
Same author

Label-free nonlinear microscopy probes cellular metabolism and myelin dynamics in live tissue.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Third-harmonic generation microscopy with focus-engineered beams: a numerical study: erratum.

Optics express·2025
Same author

Optical Sectioning for Reflection Interference Microscopy: Quantitative Imaging at Soft Interfaces.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2025
Same author

Submicrometre spatiotemporal characterization of the Toxoplasma adhesion strategy for gliding motility.

Nature microbiology·2024
Same author

Non-random spatial organization of telomeres varies during the cell cycle and requires LAP2 and BAF.

iScience·2024
Same journal

Gaussian-modulated continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 60 km fiber using an integrated silicon photonic receiver.

Optics letters·2026
Same journal

E2E-OCT: end-to-end joint learning model using optical coherence tomography images for vocal cord leukoplakia diagnosis.

Optics letters·2026
Same journal

Holographic generation of panoramic 3D scenes by concave ellipsoidal mirror reflection.

Optics letters·2026
Same journal

Dual-pilot phase recovery with pair-wise maximum-ratio combining for coherent PONs.

Optics letters·2026
Same journal

Mapping the whispering gallery modes of a CaF<sub>2</sub> disk resonator with half-tapered fibers to estimate the fundamental mode volume.

Optics letters·2026
Same journal

Quantitative estimation of deep-subwavelength scale via dark-field scattering axial energy concentration decay profiles.

Optics letters·2026
See all related articles

Third-harmonic generation (THG) microscopy signal intensity is influenced by sample structure and excitation beam focusing. Adjusting beam focusing can selectively highlight specific structures in complex biological samples, like Drosophila embryos.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Imaging
  • Optical Microscopy
  • Nonlinear Optics

Background:

  • Third-harmonic generation (THG) microscopy is a label-free imaging technique.
  • Understanding factors affecting THG signal is crucial for optimizing image quality.
  • Sample structure and excitation beam properties significantly impact signal generation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally investigate how sample structure and beam focusing affect THG signal levels.
  • To demonstrate the use of focusing control for highlighting specific structures in complex biological systems.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental characterization of THG signal in relation to sample geometry.
  • Manipulation of excitation beam's Rayleigh length.
  • Application of focusing-based contrast modulation in THG imaging of Drosophila embryos.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • THG signal dependence on spherical sample size can be tuned by altering the excitation beam's Rayleigh length.
  • The impact of focusing on THG signal is dependent on sample geometry.
  • Focusing control allows for selective visualization of structures within complex samples.

Conclusions:

  • Beam focusing is a powerful tool for controlling THG signal and enhancing contrast in microscopy.
  • This technique enables targeted highlighting of specific features in complex biological specimens.
  • THG microscopy, with controlled focusing, offers advanced capabilities for structural imaging.