Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetics, neuroscience and psychiatric classification.

Jason Scott Robert1, Thane Plantikow

  • 1Center for Biology and Society, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4701, USA. jason.robert@asu.edu

Psychopathology
|September 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How Blind Persons Perceive Sight-Restorative Technologies Matters More than We Know.

AJOB neuroscience·2024
Same author

Should research administrators be regulated as carefully as researchers?

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2024
Same author

Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?

Accountability in research·2022
Same author

Rethinking Human Embryo Research Policies.

The Hastings Center report·2021
Same author

Rereading Frankenstein: What If Victor Frankenstein Had Actually Been Evil?

The Hastings Center report·2018
Same author

Stem cell research oversight: personal reflections and public reasoning.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2013
Same journal

Childhood Maltreatment and Psychopathology: The Mediating Roles of Mentalizing and Attachment Styles.

Psychopathology·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Examination of Autistic Intersubjective Experiences (EAIE).

Psychopathology·2026
Same journal

Tourette syndrome and rage attacks - a longitudinal and cross-sectional study.

Psychopathology·2026
Same journal

Depressing temporal experiences: the COVID-19 Pandemic lockdown in Victoria, Australia.

Psychopathology·2026
Same journal

Involuntary hospitalization for treatment: Triangulation of Perspectives of patients, relatives, and professionals.

Psychopathology·2026
Same journal

Depersonalization, Emotion Embodiment, and Alexithymia in the General Population.

Psychopathology·2026
See all related articles

Psychiatric classification needs diverse data, not just genetics. Integrating genetics, neuroscience, and other fields offers a more robust approach to psychiatric nosology and diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Genetics
  • Genomics
  • Neuroscience
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Emerging genetic and genomic data prompt discussions of a revolution in psychiatric nosology.
  • Current approaches may overemphasize biological factors, neglecting sociocultural and psychological dimensions.
  • Lack of consensus on psychiatric phenomenology hinders purely genetic classification systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the potential of genetics and genomics to revolutionize psychiatric classification.
  • To advocate for a more inclusive and diversely informed approach to psychiatric nosology.
  • To explore realistic roles for genetics, genomics, and neuroscience in psychiatric diagnosis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of empirical and conceptual arguments regarding psychiatric taxonomy.
  • Analysis of differing viewpoints on the role of genetics in psychiatric diagnosis.
  • Application of Wimsatt's robustness analysis to assess claims about psychiatric genetics.
  • Development of a defense for realism about psychiatric entities.

Main Results:

  • Resistance to a genetics-driven revolution in psychiatric nosology is empirically and conceptually justified.
  • Overreliance on genetics alone is insufficient for a robust psychiatric classification system.
  • Genetics and genomics can contribute to psychiatric classification when integrated with other disciplines.

Conclusions:

  • A more diversely informed nosology is necessary for advancing psychiatric classification.
  • Integrative methodologies are crucial for psychiatric research and classification.
  • Realism about psychiatric entities can be defended through a nuanced understanding of biological and other factors.