Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
The Bayesian Alcoholism Test had better diagnostic properties for confirming diagnosis of hazardous and harmful
Aleksander Korzec1, Carla de Bruijn, Michiel van Lambalgen
1Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Postbus 9423, 1006 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.korzec@slaz.nl
Objective:
Conventional tests for alcoholism fail to confirm hazardous and harmful alcohol use (HHAU) accurately and objectively. We validated a Bayesian Alcoholism Test (BAT) for confirming the diagnosis of HHAU.
Study Design And Setting:
BAT is based on studies on the prevalence of HHAU and other diseases causing similar abnormalities, and on conditional probabilities of these disorders and associated biochemical markers and clinical signs. BAT was compared to carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in treatment-seeking alcoholics, non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers, and controls. Main outcome measures were test sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results:
Comparing alcoholics and controls, sensitivity of BAT (94%) was significantly higher than CDT (63%) and GGT (73%). The area under the ROC curve for BAT (.989) was significantly higher than the area under the curve for CDT (.909) and area under the curve for GGT (.902). Using pooled data of all 182 subjects included in the study, the amount of drinking had a significant better correlation coefficient with BAT (.795) than with CDT (.657), and GGT (.604).
Conclusion:
BAT has better diagnostic properties than CDT and GGT for confirming HHAU.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Determination of Expected Frequency

