Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
A posteriori information effects on culpability judgments from a cross-cultural perspective
Wendy W N Wan1, Chi-Yue Chiu, Chung-Leung Luk
1University of Hong Kong, China. wewan@staff.bond.edu.au
Information about a victim's morality influences perceived actor culpability. This effect was observed in American and Chinese participants, but with differing psychological and moral reasoning mechanisms across cultures.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Moral Psychology
Background:
- Observer judgments of criminal culpability can be influenced by post-crime information about the victim.
- Negative victim characteristics may decrease perceived actor culpability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of victim's moral attributes on judgments of actor culpability.
- To explore cultural differences in the psychological mechanisms underlying this effect.
Main Methods:
- 118 American and 123 Chinese participants evaluated a crime scenario.
- Participants' judgments of culpability and reasoning processes were analyzed.
Main Results:
- A posteriori victim information significantly affected culpability judgments in both cultures.
- Americans focused on the actor's psychological state, while Chinese participants focused on the actor's morality.
Conclusions:
- Victim characteristics impact culpability judgments across cultures, but the reasoning differs.
- Cultural differences in implicit theories of morality shape how observers attribute blame.
Related Concept Videos
Fundamental Attribution Error
Correspondence Bias
Actor-Observer Effect
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
The Role of Culture
