Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic imaging for aortic dissection.

Andrew J Kapustin1, Harold I Litt

  • 1Mecklenburg Radiology Associates, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|October 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging</i> Highlights 2025.

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging·2026
Same author

CT-based visualization of aortic valve morphology: from 3D energy-integrating CT to 4D photon counting CT.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a CZT-based photon-counting detector CT prototype for low-dose lung cancer screening using patient-specific lung phantoms.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Obese patient imaging: improved dose efficiency with photon-counting CT.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

K-Edge Imaging Using a Clinical Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT System.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Impact of vessel size, dose levels, and body habitus on iodine quantification in cardiovascular photon-counting computed tomography.

The British journal of radiology·2025
Same journal

A Systematic Review on the Impact of Postoperative Rehabilitation Programs in Thoracic Surgery Patients.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Endoscopic vs. Operative Management of Acute Esophageal Perforation: A 21-Year Experience at a High-Volume Referral Center.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Valved Sano Conduit During the Norwood Procedure: A Contemporary Review of Early Outcomes, Reintervention Burden, and Pulmonary Artery Growth.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Modified Konno Procedure and Transaortic Septal Myectomy in Children With Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Post-Operative Hemothorax: Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery vs Thoracotomy-Analysis of Outcomes and Costs.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
Same journal

Palliative Care Throughout the Entire Perioperative Pathway in Cardiovascular Surgery.

Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2026
See all related articles

Diagnostic imaging for aortic dissection has evolved significantly. Multidetector CT, ultrasound, and MRI are now primary tools, revolutionizing detection and evaluation of this condition.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Diagnostic Radiology

Background:

  • Diagnostic imaging for aortic dissection has undergone significant advancements.
  • Historically, conventional X-ray radiography and invasive catheter angiography were primary methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current landscape of diagnostic imaging modalities for aortic dissection.
  • To highlight the shift towards non-invasive techniques and their impact on patient care.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current diagnostic imaging techniques for aortic dissection.
  • Comparison of multidetector CT (MDCT), ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  • Discussion of the role of catheter angiography in managing complications.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multidetector CT is the predominant imaging modality for aortic dissection.
  • Ultrasound and MRI are also valuable, with accuracy dependent on operator expertise.
  • Catheter angiography is now mainly utilized for interventional treatment of complications.

Conclusions:

  • Modern imaging modalities like MDCT, ultrasound, and MRI have revolutionized aortic dissection detection and evaluation.
  • The choice of imaging modality is influenced by patient factors, physician preference, and equipment availability.
  • All primary modalities are highly accurate in experienced hands, improving diagnostic capabilities.