Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026
Chuzhen Therapy as a Non-Invasive Traditional Chinese Therapy for Neck Pain
Published on: June 6, 2025
A Cochrane review of electrotherapy for mechanical neck disorders
Peter Kroeling1, Anita R Gross, Charles H Goldsmith
1Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. kroeling@med.uni-muenchen.de
Study Design:
Systematic review.
Objective:
To assess whether electrotherapy relieves pain or improves function/disability in adults with mechanical neck disorders (MND).
Summary Of Background Data:
The effectiveness of electrotherapy as a physiotherapy option has remained unclear.
Methods:
Databases were searched from root to March 2003. Independent reviewers conducted selection, data abstraction, and quality assessment. Relative risk and standard mean differences were calculated.
Results:
Fourteen comparisons were included. For the pain outcome, we found limited evidence of benefit, ie, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy resulted in only immediate post-treatment pain relief for chronic MND and acute whiplash (WAD). Other findings included unclear or conflicting evidence (Galvanic current for acute or chronic occipital headache; iontophoresis for acute, subacute WAD; TENS for acute WAD, chronic MND; PEMF for medium- or long-term effects in acute WAD, chronic MND); and limited evidence of no benefit (diadynamic current for reduction of trigger point tenderness in chronic MND, cervicogenic headache; permanent magnets for chronic MND; electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for chronic MND).
Conclusions:
In pain as well as other outcomes, the evidence for treatment of acute or chronic MND by different forms of electrotherapy is either lacking, limited, or conflicting.
