Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Path integration: is there a difference between athletes and non-athletes?

Jonathan Bredin1, Yves Kerlirzin, Isabelle Israël

  • 1Laboratoire Action Mouvement Adaptation UPRES JE 2378, UFR STAPS Université, René Descartes, 1 rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France. jonathan.bredin@worldonline.fr

Experimental Brain Research
|November 18, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Athletes and non-athletes estimate walked distance differently when blindfolded. Athletes maintain accuracy at faster speeds, while both groups struggle at slow speeds, indicating velocity impacts spatial perception.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immediate crossover fatigue after unilateral submaximal eccentric contractions of the knee flexors involves peripheral alterations and increased global perceived fatigue.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Effect of a sex stereotype on cortical activity during a self-paced exercise: A motor-related cortical potential approach.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2023
Same author

Co-contraction around the knee and the ankle joints during post-stroke gait.

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2017
Same author

Recommendations for the Use of Serious Games in Neurodegenerative Disorders: 2016 Delphi Panel.

Frontiers in psychology·2017
Same author

Changes in Gait Variability From First Steps to Adulthood: Normative Data for the Gait Variability Index.

Journal of motor behavior·2015
Same author

Towards identifying the roll motion parameters of a motorcycle simulator.

Applied ergonomics·2013

Area of Science:

  • Human locomotion
  • Vestibular system function
  • Proprioception and spatial awareness

Background:

  • Estimating walked distance relies on vestibular, proprioceptive, and motor systems.
  • Blindfolded walking challenges spatial navigation and distance perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess blindfolded distance estimation accuracy.
  • To compare path integration performance between athletes and non-athletes.

Main Methods:

  • Healthy volunteers (21 athletes, 20 non-athletes) walked blindfolded to a target.
  • Walking trials were conducted at slow, normal, and fast velocities.
  • Distance walked was compared to the actual target distance (10m).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Increased walking velocity decreased estimated distance for both groups.
  • Both groups were accurate at normal velocities.
  • Athletes remained accurate at fast velocities; non-athletes undershot the target.
  • Accuracy significantly decreased at slow velocities for all participants.

Conclusions:

  • The perceptual system adapts to normal and fast walking velocities but is disrupted at low velocities.
  • Altering walking velocity, particularly step length, significantly impacts distance estimation.
  • Athletes demonstrate superior blindfolded distance estimation, especially at higher speeds.