Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition.

Annika Akerfelt1, Hans Colonius, Adele Diederich

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, P.O. Box 2503, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany. annikaakerfelt@yahoo.co.uk

Experimental Brain Research
|December 6, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting the sound-induced flash illusion: A time-window-of-integration approach.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Reaction Time: Relative Entropy Approach.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

Individual differences moderate effects in an Unusual Disease paradigm: A psychophysical data collection lab approach and an online experiment.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Keep your budget together! Investigating determinants on risky decision-making about losses.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Treatment of Age-Related Hearing Loss Alters Audiovisual Integration and Resting-State Functional Connectivity: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.

eNeuro·2021
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Tactile stimuli effectively stop eye movements (saccades) to visual targets. This study found tactile stop signal processing times comparable to auditory signals, offering new insights into inhibitory control.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Inhibitory control is crucial for voluntary actions.
  • Previous research primarily used auditory or visual stimuli as stop signals.
  • The efficacy of tactile stimuli in inhibiting visually-guided actions remained unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effectiveness of tactile stimuli as stop signals in a countermanding task.
  • To estimate the processing time of tactile stop signals.
  • To compare tactile stop signal processing with other sensory modalities and response types.

Main Methods:

  • An eye movement countermanding paradigm was employed.
  • Human participants were instructed to inhibit saccades to a visual target upon presentation of a tactile stop signal.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A control experiment without stop signals was conducted to assess anticipatory adjustments.

    • Main Results:

    • Tactile stimuli were demonstrated as effective stop signals for saccade inhibition.
    • Estimated tactile stop signal processing times ranged from 90-140 ms.
    • Response times were slower than predicted by the race model in the shortest stop signal delay condition, with hypometric saccades on stop failures.

    Conclusions:

    • Tactile stimuli can serve as effective stop signals, comparable in processing speed to auditory signals.
    • The findings suggest that the standard race model may require modifications to account for interactions between stop and go signal processing.
    • This research expands the understanding of sensory modalities involved in inhibitory motor control.