Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

07:11
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
Published on: May 25, 2020
Portal dose image verification: the collapsed cone superposition method applied with different electronic portal
Christina Vallhagen Dahlgren1, Karsten Eilertsen, Trude Dahl Jørgensen
1Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.
Physics in Medicine and Biology
|January 6, 2006
Summary
This study validates electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) for absolute dose calibration. Comparing calculated and measured portal dose images (PDIs) confirms EPIDs can verify patient radiation doses.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Imaging Technology
Background:
- Electronic Portal Imaging Devices (EPIDs) are crucial for verifying radiation delivery in cancer treatment.
- Accurate absolute dose verification requires comparing measured and calculated portal dose images (PDIs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate two commercial EPIDs for absolute dose calibration.
- To compare measured PDIs with calculated PDIs using a validated model.
- To assess the capability of calibrated EPIDs in verifying delivered patient radiation doses.
Main Methods:
- Two EPID types (liquid ion chamber matrix and fluoroscopic CCD camera) were calibrated to measure absolute dose.
- Portal dose images (PDIs) were acquired and transformed using specific calibration procedures.
- Measured PDIs were compared against calculated PDIs generated by a collapsed cone superposition model.
- Agreement was assessed using dose comparisons and gamma index analysis across various field shapes and phantom thicknesses.
Main Results:
- Both EPID systems demonstrated good agreement with calculated PDIs, with small average areas failing criteria ( <1% for matrix ion chamber, 7% and 1% for camera-based EPID at 6 and 15 MV).
- Central dose agreement was excellent: 0.1 ± 1.6% (1 SD) for the camera-based EPID and -0.1 ± 1.6% (1 SD) for the matrix ion chamber.
- The study confirmed the validity of the calculation method for different MV x-ray energies and phantom configurations.
Conclusions:
- Absolute dose-calibrated EPIDs can effectively validate delivered radiation doses.
- Comparing calculated and measured PDIs is a reliable method for quality assurance in radiotherapy.
- This technology enhances patient safety by ensuring accurate dose delivery.
