Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Laparoscopic-Assisted Seldinger Technique for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion
Published on: May 23, 2025
Comparison of side hole versus non side hole high flow hemodialysis catheters
Michael G Tal1, Aldo J Peixoto, Susan T Crowley
1Interventional Radiology, Yale New Haven Hospital and VA Connecticut Healthcare System, New Haven, Connecticut 06525, USA. Michael.tal@yale.edu
Insights
Non side hole hemodialysis catheters significantly reduce infection rates compared to those with side holes. This study found fewer infections and slightly better survival for non side hole catheters, with similar flow rates.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Vascular Access
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Dialysis catheters with side holes are common but may negatively impact performance.
- Limited comparative data exists on the efficacy of side hole versus non side hole hemodialysis catheters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of hemodialysis catheters with and without side holes.
- Key metrics included flow rates, infection rates, and catheter survival.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 54 patients undergoing hemodialysis over 16 months.
- Patients received either a 14.5 F MAHURKAR MAXID cuffed dual lumen tunneled catheter with side holes or without side holes.
- Data collected included catheter flow, patency, survival, and infections for up to 28 weeks.
Main Results:
- Catheter infection rates were significantly lower in the non side hole group (0.254 per 1,000 days) compared to the side hole group (2.545 per 1,000 days) (p<0.001).
- Non side hole catheters showed slightly improved catheter survival (p<0.05).
- Mean blood flow rates were not significantly different between the two catheter types.
Conclusions:
- Hemodialysis catheters without side holes demonstrate a reduced risk of infection.
- Non side hole dual lumen tunneled cuffed catheters are a viable option for improving patient outcomes in hemodialysis.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and specific patient populations.
Abstract:
Current literature suggests that side holes may be detrimental to dialysis catheter performance. Today, these catheters are primarily available with side holes. The purpose of this study was to compare flow rates, infection rate, and survival of side hole vs. non side hole hemodialysis catheters. Over a 16-month period patients were arbitrarily assigned to either a 14.5 F MAHURKAR MAXID cuffed dual lumen tunneled catheter with side holes or a 14.5 F MAHURKAR MAXID cuffed dual lumen tunneled catheter without side holes ("non side hole catheters"). We performed a retrospective analysis of catheter flow rates, patency, catheter survival, and catheter-related infections. Information was gathered for the life of the catheter or up to 28 weeks. A total of 54 patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-seven of 54 (68%) patients received a catheter with side holes for a total of 3,930 catheter days and 17/54 (32%) received a similar catheter without side holes for a total of 2,188 catheter days. Catheter infection necessitating removal of the catheter occurred in 10/37 catheters with side holes and 1/17 without side holes. Infection rates per 1,000 catheter days were 2.545 with side holes and 0.254 without side holes (p<0.001). Slightly improved catheter survival (p<0.05) was recorded with the non side hole catheters. No insertion complication (e.g., air embolization, bleeding, or kinking) occurred with either catheter. One catheter without side holes had to be repositioned 5 days after insertion because of poor flows. No significant difference was recorded in mean blood flow rates between the catheters. Results indicate reduced catheter infection rate in hemodialysis patients with the use of non side hole dual lumen tunneled cuffed catheters.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
